Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency remark-parse to v11 #54

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2023

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 18, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
remark-parse (source) ~10.0.1 -> ~11.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

remarkjs/remark (remark-parse)

v11.0.0

Compare Source

Full Changelog: https://github.com/remarkjs/remark/compare/14.0.2...remark-cli@11.0.0


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-remark-monorepo branch from 57413e7 to f787ad0 Compare September 28, 2023 03:02
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-remark-monorepo branch from f787ad0 to f8556f9 Compare September 28, 2023 03:03
@jaywcjlove jaywcjlove merged commit 4f7fbf4 into main Sep 28, 2023
1 check failed
@jaywcjlove jaywcjlove deleted the renovate/major-remark-monorepo branch September 28, 2023 03:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant