Replace outdated link with rationale for pinning #1053
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
auvipy
approved these changes
Feb 2, 2020
atugushev
reviewed
Feb 2, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @m-aciek,
Thanks picking up the task. I wouldn't completely delete the link to the blog post of the original author and would rather keep somewhere in a different section of README (see #668 (comment)) for historical reasons.
FYI detached link is abandoned now.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #668
Refs (supersedes) toanant#1
Changelog-friendly one-liner: Replace outdated link in Readme with rationale for pinning
Contributor checklist