55 enable account closure #68
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@jcreek has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 43 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce several new features and updates across multiple files. Key additions include new environment variables related to the Brevo API, enhancements to the database setup documentation, and the introduction of a new dependency for email functionalities. Additionally, a new table for account deletion requests is created in the database schema, along with associated utility functions for handling account deletion. The application now supports account deletion via both backend logic and user interface updates. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
❌ Deploy Preview for sveltekitsaasboilerplate failed.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 16
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
.env.example(1 hunks)docs/database-setup.md(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)src/lib/types/supabase.d.ts(1 hunks)src/lib/utils/brevo/email.ts(1 hunks)src/lib/utils/supabase/admin.ts(3 hunks)src/routes/account/+page.server.ts(3 hunks)src/routes/account/+page.svelte(2 hunks)src/routes/api/delete-account/+server.ts(1 hunks)src/routes/api/somebackendfunction/+server.ts(0 hunks)supabase/migrations/20241029193900_account_deletion.sql(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/routes/api/somebackendfunction/+server.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/lib/utils/brevo/email.ts
[error] 23-23: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
src/routes/account/+page.server.ts
[error] 26-26: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
.env.example (1)
7-9: LGTM! The new Brevo environment variables are properly structured.
The implementation follows good security practices with empty API key and safe default values.
src/routes/api/delete-account/+server.ts (1)
1-2: LGTM! Clean and focused imports.
The imports are well-structured and follow SvelteKit conventions.
src/lib/utils/brevo/email.ts (2)
1-6: LGTM! Secure handling of sensitive configuration.
The use of private environment variables for sensitive API configuration is a good security practice.
31-31: LGTM! Clean export statement.
The named export follows TypeScript best practices.
src/routes/account/+page.server.ts (3)
3-3: LGTM! Import statement is properly structured.
41-57: LGTM! Formatting changes improve readability.
The object structure is now more consistent with the codebase style.
22-31: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider data cleanup implications
Whilst the account deletion request is handled, ensure there's a comprehensive cleanup strategy for:
- User-generated content
- Related database records
- Authentication tokens
- External service associations
This might warrant a background job or staged deletion process.
Let's check for potential user-related tables:
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the implementation of the account deletion request to ensure it handles these dependencies properly.
Let me check for the actual deletion implementation since we only see the request part.
Account deletion implementation is properly structured
The current implementation demonstrates a well-thought-out approach to account deletion:
- Uses a two-step verification process with email confirmation
- Leverages proper database constraints:
- CASCADE deletion for critical user data (customers, user_credits)
- SET NULL for historical records (subscriptions, purchases, credit_transactions)
- Implements deletion through Supabase Auth admin API, which triggers the cascade/nullify constraints
The architecture appropriately handles data cleanup across all identified user-related tables whilst maintaining necessary transaction records for audit purposes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for table definitions that might reference user data
rg -g "*.sql" "REFERENCES.*users.*id"
Length of output: 1178
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the account deletion implementation
rg -g "*.ts" -A 10 "requestAccountDeletion"
Length of output: 2361
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the actual deletion implementation
rg -g "*.ts" -A 15 "deleteAccount"
Length of output: 2370
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 26-26: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
package.json (2)
50-50: Verify TypeScript support for @getbrevo/brevo
The addition of Brevo for transactional emails is appropriate. However, since this is a TypeScript project, please verify that the package provides proper type definitions. If types aren't bundled, consider adding @types/getbrevo__brevo if available.
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the package includes type definitions
npm info @getbrevo/brevo types
# Search for any community-maintained type definitions
npm search @types/getbrevo50-50: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Implement email security best practices
When implementing the Brevo email service, ensure:
- All email templates are properly sanitised
- Rate limiting is implemented for account deletion requests
- Email verification links include secure, time-limited tokens
- Environment variables are properly validated at startup
supabase/migrations/20241029193900_account_deletion.sql (2)
13-46: The cascade deletion strategy looks appropriate
The mix of CASCADE and SET NULL behaviours is well-thought-out:
- CASCADE for user-specific data that shouldn't exist without the user
- SET NULL for historical records that should be retained for auditing
Let's verify there are no circular dependencies:
✅ Verification successful
Foreign key constraints are correctly structured without circular dependencies
The verification confirms that:
- All foreign keys point only to
auth.usersor within the application schema - No circular references exist between tables
- The cascade/null deletion strategy is properly implemented:
- CASCADE for core user data (customers, users, user_credits, account_deletion_requests)
- SET NULL for transactional history (subscriptions, purchases, credit_transactions)
- Additional relationships to
productsandpricestables are independent of the user deletion flow
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any additional foreign key references to these tables
rg -t sql "FOREIGN KEY.*REFERENCES (customers|subscriptions|purchases|user_credits|credit_transactions|users)"
Length of output: 112
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search for foreign key constraints
rg -i "foreign key.*references" supabase/migrations/
Length of output: 1193
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Also search for table definitions to understand the schema better
rg -i "create table" supabase/migrations/
Length of output: 793
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any potential circular references in the schema
fd -e sql . supabase/migrations/ -x cat {} \; | grep -i "references\|foreign key"
Length of output: 1435
7-11: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider implementing request rate limiting
The RLS policies correctly restrict access to own records. However, there's no limit on how many deletion requests a user can create. This could potentially be abused.
Let's check if there are any existing rate limiting implementations in the codebase:
Consider adding a trigger or check constraint to prevent multiple active requests from the same user within a specific timeframe.
src/lib/types/supabase.d.ts (1)
37-62: Well-structured table definition with proper relationships
The account_deletion_requests table is well-defined with:
- Clear field definitions
- Proper one-to-one relationship with the users table
- Appropriate optional/required field specifications for Insert and Update operations
src/lib/utils/supabase/admin.ts (2)
7-7: LGTM: Email utility import added correctly
The import of the sendEmail function is properly added to support the new account deletion confirmation feature.
547-549: LGTM: Export statement properly updated
The new functions are correctly added to the exports.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@OllyNicholass there are only three coderabbit threads here that need your review, the rest have been actioned or had tickets created for them :) |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
Refactor