Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Categorie for QBIT is necessary #269

Closed
TheNexter opened this issue Apr 5, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

Categorie for QBIT is necessary #269

TheNexter opened this issue Apr 5, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@TheNexter
Copy link

#81

Hello man, yes I know you already answered this subject but I think this is really the most important function of all that could exist, let me explain:

qbittorrent is complete software with proxy, management files perfects, work with radarr and sonarr without issue and all feature work.

Transmission is to light, no proxy, no good files managements, no native interface correct to settings somethings, not a realy good downloads software.

rutorrent is not compatible with proxy, no good interface for files management and allot of other things.

If you work and release categorie, it's can be a game changer because allot of millions people use radarr / sonarr, and we need to everytimes go on ugly interface of qbit.

Only one thing can do a big and huge difference

https://hotio.dev/containers/qflood/

The team Hotio have understand that and they have a docker image just for your software 😎

Thx for your HUGE work

And sorry for my VERY bad english 😥

@jesec jesec closed this as completed Apr 5, 2021
Repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 5, 2021

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants