Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Since this is a question, I am moving it to discussions. In my opinion, the documentation is quite clear. It is simply natural to use a matching revision of libTorrent. Nonetheless, I will add a link to my libTorrent repo. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
As per my comment here, I was going to try to write a PKGBUILD for this rtorrent fork. I wanted to use cmake because a dynamic build that uses libraries managed by the package manager would be ideal for an Arch package.
The readme says:
But this suggests that I should be able to just use the correct system vendored libtorrent (0.13.8), it's not clear that I need to use a fork (or that one even exists). Took me some time to figure this out.
For example,
/usr/include/torrent/utils/ranges.h
tries to includerak/functional.h
, but you've removed this from your rtorrent fork, and your version of libtorrent no longer includes it.Of course this issue doesn't show up for the bazel build, but I don't have as much interest in a PKGBUILD that pulls in a bunch of internet dependencies for a static build. I think what this means is that a PKGBUILD would need to depend on something like libtorrent-jesec, which would be a separate PKGBUILD in the AUR.
(Sorry if I somehow misunderstood this issue, I mainly work with high level languages like Python.)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions