--bail does not work

[julien-f]

Do you want to request a feature or report a bug?

bug

What is the current behavior?

All tests are run even though --bail was used.

What is the expected behavior?

No other tests should be run after an error.

See https://github.com/julien-f/issue-jest-bail

Environment

My system is Debian Stretch.

> npm version
{ npm: '4.0.5',
  ares: '1.10.1-DEV',
  http_parser: '2.7.0',
  icu: '57.1',
  modules: '48',
  node: '6.9.4',
  openssl: '1.0.2j',
  uv: '1.9.1',
  v8: '5.1.281.89',
  zlib: '1.2.8' }

[thymikee]

Running Jest with --bail will prevent other test suites from executing.
In your case there's only 1 test suite (1 file), that's why it checks all other cases.

@cpojer I think we should stress this better in the documentation, right?

[julien-f]

Oh, I see, thanks for the info :)

[rally25rs]

I have jest v 18.1.0 and have --bail on the command line and "bail":true in my package.json, and Jest still runs all the tests in all the files.

[cpojer]

This should be fixed in master, we fixed yet another issue with bail.

[rally25rs]

Actually, I just realized that this was because a script in my "setupFiles" had an error. It looks like if a test suite fails to run, that doesn't trigger the "bail" and it moves on to the next suite (which will re-run the "setupFiles" scripts and fail for the same reason...)

[artyomtrityak]

is there any way to skip current describe and all nested describe on first failure but still run other describes? Like bail-describe for example.

[santimendoza]

According to documentation https://jestjs.io/docs/en/api#describename-fn, a describe is a test suite.

But --bail is not really working when first test suite fails.
Is there a reason this is still closed?

[mixalbl4-127]

I've made some temporary kludge for it: https://stackoverflow.com/a/53615538/2051938

[rufus2021]

I'm hitting the same issue. Also, should coverage still be running on a bail? I'd think it'd just halt everything

[dejayc]

I'm hitting the same issue. Also, should coverage still be running on a bail? I'd think it'd just halt everything

Maybe, for clarity, we can rename --bail to --politely-back-away-while-still-executing-most-things-people-will-expect-to-not-execute-upon-failure

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Please note this issue tracker is not a help forum. We recommend using StackOverflow or our discord channel for questions.