Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
7 lines (7 loc) · 2.5 KB

test.md

File metadata and controls

7 lines (7 loc) · 2.5 KB

Sure! Here's a table with timestamps and possible problems according to Brazilian law, as well as enhancement points and confidence scores, based on the video analysis:

Timestamp Potential Problem (Brazilian Law) Enhancement Point Confidence Score
0:00 - 0:15 Lack of visible Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) on workers (if present). NR 6 (Normativa Regulamentadora) mandates the use of PPE in construction. Workers should be equipped with appropriate PPE like helmets, safety glasses, gloves, and safety footwear. Medium (60%) - While no workers are clearly visible, the presence of active construction suggests workers might be present but out of frame. The lack of visible PPE raises concern.
0:00-0:15 Potential for unprotected edges and openings. NR 18 addresses fall protection measures. Install guardrails or safety nets around open edges and elevated platforms. Medium (70%) - Several open edges and elevated areas are visible without clear indication of fall protection measures.
0:05-0:11 Potential lack of organized storage of materials. NR 18 mandates proper storage to prevent accidents. Designate specific areas for material storage and ensure they are kept organized and free from obstructions. Low (40%) - It's difficult to definitively assess material storage due to the limited view. While some materials are visible, the overall organization can't be fully determined.
0:11-0:15 Potential lack of signage and warning signals. NR 26 mandates the use of clear signage to alert about hazards. Implement appropriate safety signage indicating hazards, emergency exits, and areas requiring PPE. Low (40%) - No specific signage is clearly visible, but the limited view prevents a thorough assessment. Signage might be present but not captured in the video.