You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are three vertical bars to fit in 3 pixel wide, feedback
onto the best balance sure help.
So far, only the context was used to let the reader guess it was
most likely an "M" or an "N", but things like 39ôM,30Sô would
absolutely be read as 39ôN,30ôS
I will add a font editing suite in-source to have glyphs stored
like this then generating the various other formats:
```
K:
# . # .
# . # .
# # . .
# . # .
# . # .
. . . .
. . . .
```
Also, we can give a peek at the excellent attempt of Robey:
http://robey.lag.net/2010/01/23/tiny-monospace-font.html
It was also much better packaged around.
Thank you for taking the time to report this, will come back to you
as soon as the editing tools are there for merging the changes.
Hey there,
Looking at the the full charset:
And zooming in around the M,N area.
N looks a lot more like other M-like characters and M looks possibly closer to what you'd expect an N to look like.
I think it might clearer to modify the font to be:
Many thanks,
Alister
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: