You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am in favor of the following syntax for declaring a structured data type:
DIS IS A <class_name> KINDA LIKE A <base_class_name> BUT
IT GOT A <variable>
IT GOT A <variable> ITZ <value>
IT CAN <function_name>
OKIE
Instantiation can be done with: I HAS A <instance_name> ITZ <class_name> BORN WIF <arguments>, or <instance_name> R <class_name> BORN WIF <arguments>
Accessing elements of the structure can be done with I HAS A <variable> ITZ DA <field_name> OV <instance_name>, or <variable> R DA <field_name> OV <instance_name>.
Other syntax could be used - but I would certainly like structured data types!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am in favor of the following syntax for declaring a structured data type:
Instantiation can be done with:
I HAS A <instance_name> ITZ <class_name> BORN WIF <arguments>
, or<instance_name> R <class_name> BORN WIF <arguments>
Accessing elements of the structure can be done with
I HAS A <variable> ITZ DA <field_name> OV <instance_name>
, or<variable> R DA <field_name> OV <instance_name>
.Other syntax could be used - but I would certainly like structured data types!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: