Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature: analyzer for Nodes #210

Closed
3 of 4 tasks
botchk opened this issue Apr 4, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #272
Closed
3 of 4 tasks

feature: analyzer for Nodes #210

botchk opened this issue Apr 4, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #272
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@botchk
Copy link
Contributor

botchk commented Apr 4, 2023

Checklist:

  • I've searched for similar issues and couldn't find anything matching
  • I've discussed this feature in the #k8sgpt slack channel

Is this feature request related to a problem?

  • Yes
  • No

Describe the solution you'd like

It would be helpful to also look at nodes for potential problems. Node conditions are a good indicator that something is wrong and can point to the root cause of why certain workloads are not being scheduled.

I would suggest this analyzer as core, enabled by default.

Benefits for the project and its users

Users can detect and troubleshoot problems of their nodes

@botchk
Copy link
Contributor Author

botchk commented Apr 4, 2023

Feel free to assign this issue to me 😄

@AlexsJones AlexsJones added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 4, 2023
@AlexsJones
Copy link
Member

How are you getting on with this @yeahservice ?

@botchk
Copy link
Contributor Author

botchk commented Apr 12, 2023

@AlexsJones some busy past days for me but I am expecting to get a PR out by the end of this week.

@botchk botchk mentioned this issue Apr 14, 2023
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants