You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the current implementation, every simulator apart from ArtIllumina has mutually exclusive number_of_read_tuples and coverage parameters.
When the genome is short and coverage is low, this result in no read being simulated (and, currently, in error #53).
A desirable behaviour would be to use the max between number_of_read_tuples and the effect of coverage as final value for the number of reads.
This would guarantee that at least number_of_read_tuples are simulated for each fasta. By default, number_of_read_tuples should be one.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
simonepignotti
changed the title
Use number_of_read_tuples param when greater than coverage's
Use number_of_read_tuples param when greater than coverage's
Jun 19, 2018
In the current implementation, every simulator apart from ArtIllumina has mutually exclusive
number_of_read_tuples
andcoverage
parameters.When the genome is short and coverage is low, this result in no read being simulated (and, currently, in error #53).
A desirable behaviour would be to use the max between
number_of_read_tuples
and the effect ofcoverage
as final value for the number of reads.This would guarantee that at least
number_of_read_tuples
are simulated for each fasta. By default,number_of_read_tuples
should be one.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: