-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 128
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Merge pull request #608 from chaosi-zju/main
add userguide for workload-rebalancer
- Loading branch information
Showing
2 changed files
with
323 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@ | ||
--- | ||
title: Workload Rebalance | ||
--- | ||
|
||
In general case, after replicas of workloads is scheduled, it will keep the scheduling result inert | ||
and the replicas distribution will not change. Even if reschedule is triggered by modifying replicas or placement, | ||
it will maintain the exist replicas distribution as closely as possible, only making minimal adjustments when necessary, | ||
which minimizes disruptions and preserves the balance across clusters. | ||
|
||
However, in some scenarios, users hope to have approach to actively trigger a fresh rescheduling, which disregards the | ||
previous assignment entirely and seeks to establish an entirely new replica distribution across clusters. | ||
|
||
## Applicable Scenarios | ||
|
||
### Scenario 1 | ||
|
||
In cluster failover scenario, replicas are distributed in member1 + member2 two clusters, however they would all migrate to | ||
member2 cluster if member1 cluster fails. | ||
|
||
As a cluster administrator, I hope the replicas redistribute to two clusters when member1 cluster recovered, so that | ||
the resources of the member1 cluster will be re-utilized, also for the sake of high availability. | ||
|
||
### Scenario 2 | ||
|
||
In application-level failover, low-priority applications may be preempted, resulting in shrinking from multi clusters | ||
to single cluster due to cluster resources are in short supply | ||
(refer to [Application-level Failover](https://karmada.io/docs/next/userguide/failover/application-failover#why-application-level-failover-is-required)). | ||
|
||
As a user, I hope the replicas of low-priority applications can be redistributed to multi clusters when | ||
cluster resources are sufficient to ensure the high availability of application. | ||
|
||
### Scenario 3 | ||
|
||
In `Aggregated` schedule type, replicas may still distribute across multiple clusters due to resource constraints. | ||
|
||
As a user, I hope the replicas to be redistributed in an aggregated strategy when any cluster has | ||
sufficient resource to accommodate all replicas, so that the application better meets actual business requirements. | ||
|
||
|
||
### Scenario 4 | ||
|
||
In disaster-recovery scenario, replicas migrated from primary cluster to backup cluster when primary cluster failure. | ||
|
||
As a cluster administrator, I hope that replicas can migrate back when cluster restored, so that: | ||
|
||
1. restore to the disaster-recovery mode to ensure the reliability and stability of the cluster federation. | ||
2. save the cost of the backup cluster. | ||
|
||
## Feature of WorkloadRebalancer | ||
|
||
### Reschedule a workload | ||
|
||
Assuming here is deployment named `demo-deploy`, and you want to trigger the rescheduling of it. You can just apply | ||
following WorkloadRebalancer. | ||
|
||
```yaml | ||
apiVersion: apps.karmada.io/v1alpha1 | ||
kind: WorkloadRebalancer | ||
metadata: | ||
name: demo | ||
spec: | ||
workloads: | ||
- apiVersion: apps/v1 | ||
kind: Deployment | ||
name: demo-deploy | ||
namespace: default | ||
``` | ||
Then, scheduler will do a rescheduling to this deployment, which disregards the previous assignment entirely and seeks | ||
to establish an entirely new replica distribution across clusters. | ||
* If it succeeds, you will get following result: | ||
```yaml | ||
apiVersion: apps.karmada.io/v1alpha1 | ||
kind: WorkloadRebalancer | ||
metadata: | ||
name: demo | ||
generation: 1 | ||
creationTimestamp: "2024-05-22T11:16:10Z" | ||
spec: | ||
... | ||
status: | ||
finishTime: "2024-05-22T11:16:10Z" | ||
observedGeneration: 1 | ||
observedWorkloads: | ||
- result: Successful | ||
workload: | ||
apiVersion: apps/v1 | ||
kind: Deployment | ||
name: demo-deploy | ||
namespace: default | ||
``` | ||
* If the resource binding of `deployments/demo-deploy` not exist, you will get following result: | ||
|
||
```yaml | ||
apiVersion: apps.karmada.io/v1alpha1 | ||
kind: WorkloadRebalancer | ||
metadata: | ||
name: demo | ||
generation: 1 | ||
creationTimestamp: "2024-05-22T11:16:10Z" | ||
spec: | ||
... | ||
status: | ||
finishTime: "2024-05-22T11:16:10Z" | ||
observedGeneration: 1 | ||
observedWorkloads: | ||
- reason: ReferencedBindingNotFound | ||
result: Failed | ||
workload: | ||
apiVersion: apps/v1 | ||
kind: Deployment | ||
name: demo-deploy | ||
namespace: default | ||
``` | ||
|
||
* If an exception fails during processing, such as a network problem or a throttling problem, the rebalancer will keep retrying, | ||
and you will get following result: | ||
|
||
```yaml | ||
apiVersion: apps.karmada.io/v1alpha1 | ||
kind: WorkloadRebalancer | ||
metadata: | ||
name: demo | ||
generation: 1 | ||
creationTimestamp: "2024-05-22T11:26:10Z" | ||
spec: | ||
... | ||
status: | ||
observedGeneration: 1 | ||
observedWorkloads: | ||
- workload: | ||
apiVersion: apps/v1 | ||
kind: Deployment | ||
name: demo-deploy | ||
namespace: default | ||
``` | ||
|
||
> tip: there will be no `finishTime` in status field, nor `result/reason` field in each observed workload in this case | ||
> since it still retrying. | ||
|
||
### Reschedule a batch of resources | ||
|
||
In actual scenarios, you need to trigger rescheduling in the application dimension, that is, you need to trigger | ||
rescheduling of a batch of resources. Assuming the resources are `deployment/demo-deploy`, `configmap/demo-config` and | ||
`clusterrole/demo-role`, you can define the WorkloadRebalancer like this: | ||
|
||
```yaml | ||
apiVersion: apps.karmada.io/v1alpha1 | ||
kind: WorkloadRebalancer | ||
metadata: | ||
name: demo | ||
spec: | ||
workloads: | ||
- apiVersion: apps/v1 | ||
kind: Deployment | ||
name: demo-deploy | ||
namespace: default | ||
- apiVersion: v1 | ||
kind: ConfigMap | ||
name: demo-config | ||
namespace: default | ||
- apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1 | ||
kind: ClusterRole | ||
name: demo-role | ||
``` | ||
|
||
you can get result like this: | ||
|
||
```yaml | ||
apiVersion: apps.karmada.io/v1alpha1 | ||
kind: WorkloadRebalancer | ||
metadata: | ||
name: demo | ||
generation: 1 | ||
creationTimestamp: "2024-05-22T11:36:10Z" | ||
spec: | ||
... | ||
status: | ||
finishTime: "2024-05-22T11:36:10Z" | ||
observedGeneration: 1 | ||
observedWorkloads: | ||
- result: Successful | ||
workload: | ||
apiVersion: apps/v1 | ||
kind: Deployment | ||
name: demo-deploy | ||
namespace: default | ||
- result: Successful | ||
workload: | ||
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1 | ||
kind: ClusterRole | ||
name: demo-role | ||
- result: Successful | ||
workload: | ||
apiVersion: v1 | ||
kind: ConfigMap | ||
name: demo-config | ||
namespace: default | ||
``` | ||
|
||
> tip: the observedWorkloads is ordered according to the dictionary order of apiVersion, kind, namespace, and name. | ||
|
||
### Modify WorkloadRebalancer | ||
|
||
The rebalancer can also support update, the guideline is: | ||
|
||
* a new workload added to spec list, just add it into status list too and do the rebalance. | ||
* a workload deleted from previous spec list, keep it in status list if already success, and remove it if not. | ||
* a workload is modified, just regard it as deleted an old one and inserted a new one. | ||
|
||
Assuming the current WorkloadRebalancer is as follows: | ||
|
||
```yaml | ||
apiVersion: apps.karmada.io/v1alpha1 | ||
kind: WorkloadRebalancer | ||
metadata: | ||
name: demo | ||
generation: 1 | ||
creationTimestamp: "2024-05-22T11:36:10Z" | ||
spec: | ||
workloads: | ||
- apiVersion: apps/v1 | ||
kind: Deployment | ||
name: demo-deploy-1 | ||
namespace: default | ||
- apiVersion: apps/v1 | ||
kind: Deployment | ||
name: demo-deploy-2 | ||
namespace: default | ||
status: | ||
finishTime: "2024-05-22T11:36:10Z" | ||
observedGeneration: 1 | ||
observedWorkloads: | ||
- result: Successful | ||
workload: | ||
apiVersion: apps/v1 | ||
kind: Deployment | ||
name: demo-deploy-1 | ||
namespace: default | ||
- reason: ReferencedBindingNotFound | ||
result: Failed | ||
workload: | ||
apiVersion: apps/v1 | ||
kind: Deployment | ||
name: demo-deploy-2 | ||
namespace: default | ||
``` | ||
|
||
Now, if I edit target workloads from `demo-deploy-1` + `demo-deploy-2` to only `demo-deploy-3`, result will be: | ||
|
||
```yaml | ||
apiVersion: apps.karmada.io/v1alpha1 | ||
kind: WorkloadRebalancer | ||
metadata: | ||
name: demo | ||
generation: 2 | ||
creationTimestamp: "2024-05-22T11:36:10Z" | ||
spec: | ||
workloads: | ||
- apiVersion: apps/v1 | ||
kind: Deployment | ||
name: demo-deploy-3 | ||
namespace: default | ||
status: | ||
finishTime: "2024-05-22T11:40:10Z" | ||
observedGeneration: 2 | ||
observedWorkloads: | ||
- result: Successful | ||
workload: | ||
apiVersion: apps/v1 | ||
kind: Deployment | ||
name: demo-deploy-1 | ||
namespace: default | ||
- result: Successful | ||
workload: | ||
apiVersion: apps/v1 | ||
kind: Deployment | ||
name: demo-deploy-3 | ||
namespace: default | ||
``` | ||
|
||
You can see in `status.observedWorkloads`: | ||
|
||
* `demo-deploy-1` is not specified in latest `spec`, but it is already succeed, so it keep exists in `status`. | ||
* `demo-deploy-2` is not specified in latest `spec` and it once failed, so it is removed from `status`. | ||
* `demo-deploy-3` is newly add in latest `spec`, so it is added to `status`. | ||
|
||
### Auto clean WorkloadRebalancer | ||
|
||
You can use `spec.ttlSecondsAfterFinished` to specify when the object will be automatically deleted after it | ||
finished execution (finished execution means each target workload is finished with result of `Successful` or `Failed`). | ||
|
||
The guideline is: | ||
|
||
* If this field is set, `ttlSecondsAfterFinished` seconds after the WorkloadRebalancer finishes, it will be automatically deleted. | ||
* If this field is unset, the WorkloadRebalancer won't be automatically deleted. | ||
* If this field is set to zero, the WorkloadRebalancer will be deleted immediately right after it finishes. | ||
|
||
Here is an example: | ||
|
||
```yaml | ||
apiVersion: apps.karmada.io/v1alpha1 | ||
kind: WorkloadRebalancer | ||
metadata: | ||
name: demo | ||
spec: | ||
ttlSecondsAfterFinished: 60 | ||
workloads: | ||
- apiVersion: apps/v1 | ||
kind: Deployment | ||
name: demo-deploy | ||
namespace: default | ||
``` | ||
|
||
Then, it will be deleted 60 seconds after the WorkloadRebalancer finished execution. | ||
|
||
## What's next | ||
|
||
For detail demo of workload rebalancer you can refer to the tutorial [Workload Rebalancer](../../tutorials/workload-rebalancer.md) |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters