mongo7 upgrade

[Xiangs18]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.10390% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 70.06%. Comparing base (9d204a4) to head (dd85c57).
Report is 13 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...rativemethodstore/db/mongo/MongoDynamicRepoDB.java	97.10%	2 Missing ⚠️
...base/narrativemethodstore/db/mongo/MongoUtils.java	87.50%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop      #99      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      71.09%   70.06%   -1.04%     
+ Complexity      1457     1437      -20     
=============================================
  Files             91       91              
  Lines           5048     5034      -14     
  Branches         478      479       +1     
=============================================
- Hits            3589     3527      -62     
- Misses          1239     1296      +57     
+ Partials         220      211       -9     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[MrCreosote]

Note to self - didn't review MongoUtils, MongoDBHelper changes yet

[MrCreosote]

I don't understand where the +57 codecov misses are coming from, looking at the actual report at codecov there's definitely not 57 new uncovered lines

[MrCreosote]

There's quite a lot of under the hood behavioral changes now, which look like they should have the same result and aren't subject to race conditions, but the low code coverage for this repo makes me nervous. I think this one is going to need some manual testing covering the altered code paths

[Xiangs18]

I don't understand where the +57 codecov misses are coming from, looking at the actual report at codecov there's definitely not 57 new uncovered lines

Where did you see the +57 Codecov misses? What I saw is this link.

[MrCreosote]

[MrCreosote]

LGTM.

You're def going to want to run some manual tests to check the pull and replace vs. update changes work as expected