Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Virtuoso OntoDriver #57

Open
ledsoft opened this issue Nov 7, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Virtuoso OntoDriver #57

ledsoft opened this issue Nov 7, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@ledsoft
Copy link
Contributor

ledsoft commented Nov 7, 2019

As a user, I want to be able to use Virtuoso server as storage. This will, according to documentation, require a custom OntoDriver implementation using either Virtuoso's RDF4J or Jena provider.

The driver should probably allow the user to choose whether the RDF4J or Jena Virtuoso Provider will be used for connection. The other choice is to support only one of the providers for starters.

Note that Virtuoso code (including the providers) is licensed under GPLv2, so the driver, which will probably have to incorporate the provider(s) - as they are not published in Maven - will have to adhere to this license as well.

Relevant sources:

@ledsoft ledsoft added the feature label Nov 7, 2019
@ledsoft
Copy link
Contributor Author

ledsoft commented May 15, 2020

Waiting for OpenLink to publish its RDF4J/Jena provider in Maven. See issue 249 and the corresponding PR 905 for mavenizing the RDF4J provider.

@ledsoft ledsoft added the blocked Indicates that the issue resolution is blocked by external factors label Sep 16, 2020
@ledsoft ledsoft removed the blocked Indicates that the issue resolution is blocked by external factors label Oct 7, 2022
@ledsoft
Copy link
Contributor Author

ledsoft commented Oct 7, 2022

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant