We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OverloadedLabels
The Unrestricted OverloadedLabels proposal, implemented in GHC 9.6, enables things like #Constructor or #123.
#Constructor
#123
This would enable things like
_
#3
position @3
This should be implementable in a backwards-compatible way, but it should be easier when using UnconsSymbol from GHC 9.2. WDYT?
UnconsSymbol
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Reopening since the positional #3 would also be nice to have
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
The Unrestricted
OverloadedLabels
proposal, implemented in GHC 9.6, enables things like#Constructor
or#123
.This would enable things like
_
prefix (done in Support unprefixed constructor prisms on GHC 9.6 #152)#3
forposition @3
.This should be implementable in a backwards-compatible way, but it should be easier when using
UnconsSymbol
from GHC 9.2. WDYT?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: