Decide on the best place to publish information about kedro-telemetry to our users

[yetudada]

Description

A lot of open-source projects will detail their telemetry collection practices in their documentation. This task is to consult @stichbury about the best placement of our information about kedro-telemetry. Do we leave it on the README.md or move this document to our documentation so it's more visible for users?

[stichbury]

I think this is probably a case of "Why not both?". I think it would make sense to have a better coverage of telemetry in the main docs (this could be in the plugins section perhaps) and link that through to the README.

I would not put any more in the first place telemetry is mentioned since that's getting in the way of most new users creating a first project, but instead possibly put a description in the glossary or a section in the plugins docs (which need some work anyway, so we could make better sections for Kedro-team maintained plugins like telemetry). This would summarise briefly but use the README as the main resource.

[astrojuanlu]

I support adding this to our docs on top of the README, which is what most other projects do #510 (comment)

[astrojuanlu]

Also, the current link https://github.com/kedro-org/kedro-plugins/tree/main/kedro-telemetry#privacy-notice is broken (it lands on the README but there's no "privacy notice" header anymore). We need a more permanent place for this.

I think it would make sense to have a better coverage of telemetry in the main docs (this could be in the plugins section perhaps) and link that through to the README.

I'm +1 on this. Any objections @merelcht @rashidakanchwala @NeroOkwa ? (So that we can log the decision)

[astrojuanlu]

I'll take that as a yes. Let's place this information on https://docs.kedro.org/.

[stichbury]

In closing this, I'll assume you're ticketing the work itself separately.

[astrojuanlu]

Yep, #508