Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Acknowledge dbx deprecation in docs? #3204

Closed
astrojuanlu opened this issue Oct 19, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

Acknowledge dbx deprecation in docs? #3204

astrojuanlu opened this issue Oct 19, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
Issue: Feature Request New feature or improvement to existing feature

Comments

@astrojuanlu
Copy link
Member

Description

In https://docs.kedro.org/en/stable/deployment/databricks/databricks_ide_development_workflow.html we explain how to use dbx and Databricks Repos, but it turns out dbx is deprecated in favour of asset bundles:

Databricks recommends that you use Databricks asset bundles instead of dbx by Databricks Labs. See What are Databricks asset bundles? and Migrate from dbx to bundles.

https://docs.databricks.com/en/archive/dev-tools/dbx/index.html

This issue doesn't have to be "rewrite the docs for asset bundles", just add a note somewhere stating that dbx is deprecated and that the document needs updating.

Alternatively, we might decide to not do anything for now.

@astrojuanlu astrojuanlu added the Issue: Feature Request New feature or improvement to existing feature label Oct 19, 2023
@laizaparizotto
Copy link
Contributor

Do you think the same functionalities could be achieved with asset bundles?

@astrojuanlu
Copy link
Member Author

It's a good question, I don't have a readily answer 😄

@stichbury
Copy link
Contributor

stichbury commented Oct 20, 2023

Created a PR with a note to point to the information above #3212

@astrojuanlu
Copy link
Member Author

This was already addressed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Issue: Feature Request New feature or improvement to existing feature
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants