You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Within the macro, type information flows from left to right throughout, allowing type inference to finish the job in the generated code.
However, interpolated values are typechecked before the macro runs. Some interpolated optics that have type parameters (ie monocle.function.At.at) crap out with [Nothing,Nothing], because they don't have the information. Is it possible within the macro to redact the type parameters, inserting the information that we already know?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Within the macro, type information flows from left to right throughout, allowing type inference to finish the job in the generated code.
However, interpolated values are typechecked before the macro runs. Some interpolated optics that have type parameters (ie
monocle.function.At.at
) crap out with[Nothing,Nothing]
, because they don't have the information. Is it possible within the macro to redact the type parameters, inserting the information that we already know?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: