rml:Strategy and rml:strategy descriptions are missing in the spec

[frmichel]

This is a follow up of kg-construct/rml-cc#19.
It's been agreed to create class rml:Strategy in rml-core, but keep the definition of instances rml:Append and rml:CartesianProduct in the collection-containers-spec.

[frmichel]

@anaigmo @andimou @dachafra
I just renamed the issue to include also the rml:strategy property. For now it is defined in the rml-cc spec but it should be moved to rml-core.

[anaigmo]

I've been checking and the both rml:Strategy and rml:strategy are in the ontology proposed in #60

[frmichel]

Ok fine, how about the text specification itself? If not there yet you can copy the one from the CC spec, then I'll remove.

[dachafra]

@anaigmo did you include the text about rml:Strategy in this spec¿

[anaigmo]

I'm assigning this to @andimou and @pmaria as they are the editors of this spec

[bjdmeest]

AGREEMENT 03/07: is described in the RML ontology, doesn't need additional descriptions in RML core spec (but CC spec will refer to the RML ontology (although that's a bit incoherent with other references, which always refer to specs instead of the ontology). We'll keep an issue open within core to remind us that Strategy exists @dachafra