clarifty term vs value, and include multivalues

[bjdmeest]

Inputs and outputs of the functions must be values, so then they can be used in terms
So output cannot be a term map, returns expression evaluation results
Agreement: keep datatype (fno:type) in the description of the parameter of the function
The FNML spec will be reviewed regarding the usage of ‘term’ and ‘value’ to avoid misunderstandings.

Considering having a type array within rml, that is not an rdf:list or a multivalue, maybe add in the parameters ‘treatAsArray’ or something similar. Restrict to FNML or expand to the rest of the RML spec?
New proposal: make a class to describe further the type in the parameter. For now, leave in the parametermap, eventually decide if it’s worth it passing it to other specs
Regarding naming, list instead of array. But it is not an rdf:list. Reusing xs:list (https://www.w3schools.com/xml/el_list.asp)
Will be an extension to FnO, bur not part of RML