-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 332
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add cluster creation logic for local users #569
Conversation
Please add tests for the new functions, since they're not placeholders anymore. That helper function for running shell commands will be very useful for covering the scenarios. |
unit test added, thanks for changing the title btw |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
unit test added, thanks for changing the title btw
Thanks. I assume that testSetup
is coming?
dec1903
to
4123dde
Compare
4123dde
to
15f3130
Compare
/retest
…On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 4:49 PM Knative Prow Robot ***@***.***> wrote:
@chaodaiG <https://github.com/chaodaiG>: The following test *failed*, say
/retest to rerun them all:
Test name Commit Details Rerun command
pull-knative-pkg-unit-tests 15f3130
<15f3130>
link
<https://prow.knative.dev/view/gcs/knative-prow/pr-logs/pull/knative_pkg/569/pull-knative-pkg-unit-tests/1161423622468800514> /test
pull-knative-pkg-unit-tests
Full PR test history <https://gubernator.knative.dev/pr/knative_pkg/569>. Your
PR dashboard <https://gubernator.knative.dev/pr/chaodaiG>.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here
<https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md>. If
you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an
issue against the kubernetes/test-infra
<https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:>
repository. I understand the commands that are listed here
<https://go.k8s.io/bot-commands>.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#569?email_source=notifications&email_token=AKXNDYM74N2KOEKAOOKIVNLQENB75A5CNFSM4ILHDTV2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD4HJTGA#issuecomment-521050520>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKXNDYIQU4RTULM7SV5Z453QENB75ANCNFSM4ILHDTVQ>
.
|
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: adrcunha, chaodaiG The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
ReportObjectsLists now accepts a namespace option to filter results to the test context namespace. This avoids noise from unrelated namespaces in test reports.
Add logic of checking for local environment, i.e. uses existing cluster if kubeconfig is set, uses existing gcp project if gcloud is set.
Part of: knative/test-infra#1186
/cc @adrcunha