Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix NullPointerException in PydanticTypeCheckerInspection.kt #362

Conversation

koxudaxi
Copy link
Owner

@koxudaxi koxudaxi commented Sep 4, 2021

Related Issues

#360

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 4, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #362 (51a3dad) into master (1e7de55) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #362   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     73.18%   73.18%           
  Complexity      283      283           
=========================================
  Files            23       23           
  Lines          1678     1678           
  Branches        509      509           
=========================================
  Hits           1228     1228           
  Misses          166      166           
  Partials        284      284           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 73.18% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...koxudaxi/pydantic/PydanticTypeCheckerInspection.kt 88.65% <0.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 57fb8e8...51a3dad. Read the comment docs.

@koxudaxi koxudaxi merged commit c55822b into master Sep 4, 2021
@koxudaxi koxudaxi deleted the fix_null_pointer_exception_in_pydantic_type_checker_inspection branch September 4, 2021 14:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant