Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Null Pointer Exception in PydanticTypeCheckerInspection #431

Merged

Conversation

koxudaxi
Copy link
Owner

@koxudaxi koxudaxi commented Feb 4, 2022

Related Issues

#392

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 4, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #431 (5530cc3) into master (c353d2a) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #431   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     73.07%   73.07%           
  Complexity      277      277           
=========================================
  Files            23       23           
  Lines          1675     1675           
  Branches        506      506           
=========================================
  Hits           1224     1224           
  Misses          166      166           
  Partials        285      285           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 73.07% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...koxudaxi/pydantic/PydanticTypeCheckerInspection.kt 88.65% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 03dd6ba...5530cc3. Read the comment docs.

@koxudaxi koxudaxi merged commit 6a20563 into master Feb 4, 2022
@koxudaxi koxudaxi deleted the fix_null_pointer_exception_in_PydanticTypeCheckerInspection branch February 4, 2022 16:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant