Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix fields module name for pydantic v1 #71

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 20, 2019
Merged

Conversation

koxudaxi
Copy link
Owner

The PR fix fields module name.
Pydantic v1 change Schema to Field.

Related issues

pydantic/pydantic#577

@koxudaxi koxudaxi changed the title fix fields moduels name for pydantic v1 fix fields module name for pydantic v1 Sep 20, 2019
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 20, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #71 into master will increase coverage by 1.75%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master      #71      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     77.56%   79.31%   +1.75%     
  Complexity       80       80              
============================================
  Files             7        7              
  Lines           361      382      +21     
  Branches        128      146      +18     
============================================
+ Hits            280      303      +23     
  Misses           25       25              
+ Partials         56       54       -2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
src/com/koxudaxi/pydantic/Pydantic.kt 80% <ø> (+9.62%) 0 <0> (ø) ⬇️
src/com/koxudaxi/pydantic/PydanticInspection.kt 81.48% <0%> (+3.7%) 2% <0%> (ø) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5237b5a...929134c. Read the comment docs.

@koxudaxi koxudaxi merged commit 12367bf into master Sep 20, 2019
@koxudaxi koxudaxi deleted the fix_fields_module_name branch September 20, 2019 17:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant