Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FID score on cifar10 dataset #16

Open
backwards123 opened this issue Apr 20, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

FID score on cifar10 dataset #16

backwards123 opened this issue Apr 20, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@backwards123
Copy link

Hello, I trained your code, but after I trained 2850 epochs on cifar10, using form2 and not using GMM, the FID@50k I got was only 4.00, which is much different from the 2.86 in your paper. I'm wondering why this is happening? Can you give your complete list of hyperparameters during training? Thank you!

@backwards123
Copy link
Author

It may also be that there is a problem with the hyperparameters in my evaluation. If possible, please tell me the complete list of hyperparameters in your test, thank you

@kpandey008
Copy link
Owner

kpandey008 commented Apr 20, 2023

Hi, Thanks for pointing this out. I noticed that the link to newer checkpoints for CIFAR-10 is missing. I will add a link to the new checkpoints soon.

[Edit] Furthermore, when training from scratch (only for CIFAR-10) you might want to use the rework-exact-repro branch instead since we found that using the Unet model used in the DDIM repo (https://github.com/ermongroup/ddim) gives best result both for the baseline DDPM and consequently DiffuseVAE

@backwards123
Copy link
Author

Thanks Reply! I know where the problem is.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants