You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hey, this is just a thanks for rate, it seems like a nice piece of work, much-much nicer to read than drat-trim. I will be switching to it soon. I think the SAT community should switch to it... maybe I'll write a blog post about it one time, it's pretty nice and so much easier to understand than drat-trim.
Thanks again,
Mate
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Actually, among efficient DRAT checkers, gratgen is probably the easiest to fully understand, because rate adds quite some complexity to handle unit clause deletions. Still, I try to make rate as easy as possible to use and read.
I think the SAT community should switch to it
Yeah, it would be cool if rate were to be adopted by the SAT community, because I think it implements a cleaner semantics than the other proof checkers. It was originally created for my master's thesis which should be done in a few weeks, but I'll definitely keep maintaining it and add new features as needed. Since it's now mature enough for production use, I am splitting the binaries into separate crates and I'll publish them on crates.io by next week, then people can simply use cargo to install a stable version.
Nice, it can't hurt to spread the word, since it could be useful to others working with SAT!
Hey, this is just a thanks for rate, it seems like a nice piece of work, much-much nicer to read than drat-trim. I will be switching to it soon. I think the SAT community should switch to it... maybe I'll write a blog post about it one time, it's pretty nice and so much easier to understand than drat-trim.
Thanks again,
Mate
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: