fix: inconsistent handling of unexpected HashNode #73
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent update focuses on enhancing error reporting within the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- trie/zk/merkle_tree.go (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
trie/zk/merkle_tree.go (3)
- 266-266: The inclusion of the level (
lvl) in the error message for theDeletemethod when encountering a hash node is a good improvement. It enhances error reporting by providing more context, which aids in debugging. This change aligns with the PR's objective to improve error handling within theMerkleTreestructure.- 356-356: Similarly, the addition of the level (
lvl) in the error message for theProvemethod when encountering a hash node is beneficial. It provides valuable context in error reporting, facilitating easier identification of issues within the Merkle tree structure. This change is consistent with the PR's goal to enhance error handling and debugging capabilities.- 338-345: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-400]
Overall, the file appears to be well-structured and follows good practices in terms of modularity and error handling. The changes made in this PR are focused and directly address the issue at hand without introducing any apparent new issues. It's recommended to ensure that all other methods interacting with hash nodes maintain consistency with these changes, potentially applying similar enhancements where applicable.
jyc228
force-pushed
the
fix/inconsistent-handling-of-unexpected-hashnode
branch
from
5b3116b to
1f6553d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- trie/zk/merkle_tree.go (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
trie/zk/merkle_tree.go (2)
- 264-264: The inclusion of the level (
lvl) in the error message within theDeletemethod when encountering a hash node is a positive change. It enhances error reporting by providing more context, which aids in debugging. This change aligns with the PR objectives and follows best practices for error handling.- 354-354: Similarly, the addition of the level (
lvl) in the error message within theProvemethod when encountering a hash node is commendable. It improves error reporting by offering additional context, facilitating easier identification and resolution of issues related to unexpected hash nodes. This modification is consistent with the PR's goal of enhancing error message clarity and context.
jyc228
force-pushed
the
fix/inconsistent-handling-of-unexpected-hashnode
branch
from
1f6553d to
f2f8d53
Compare
Summary by CodeRabbit
MerkleTreestructure by including the level in error messages for improved context.