+
+
+ 
+
+
+
+
+
++ A modular tool to aggregate results from bioinformatics analyses across many samples into a single report. +
+ + + +This report has been generated by the Plague Phylogeography analysis pipeline. For information about how to interpret these results, please see the documentation. ++ + + + + + + + + +
Report + + generated on 2021-02-12, 15:18 + + + based on data in: + +
+-
+
+
/2/scratch/keaton/plague-phylogeography/results/eager/local/IP579
+
+ /2/scratch/keaton/plague-phylogeography/results/eager/local/IP283
+
+ /2/scratch/keaton/plague-phylogeography/results/eager/local/IP562
+
+ /2/scratch/keaton/plague-phylogeography/results/eager/local/IP542
+
+ /2/scratch/keaton/plague-phylogeography/results/eager/local/IP543
+
+ /2/scratch/keaton/plague-phylogeography/results/eager/local/IP557
+
+ /2/scratch/keaton/plague-phylogeography/results/qualimap/local/IP579
+
+ /2/scratch/keaton/plague-phylogeography/results/qualimap/local/IP283
+
+ /2/scratch/keaton/plague-phylogeography/results/qualimap/local/IP562
+
+ /2/scratch/keaton/plague-phylogeography/results/qualimap/local/IP542
+
+ /2/scratch/keaton/plague-phylogeography/results/qualimap/local/IP543
+
+ /2/scratch/keaton/plague-phylogeography/results/qualimap/local/IP557
+
+ /2/scratch/keaton/plague-phylogeography/results/snippy_pairwise/local/IP579
+
+ /2/scratch/keaton/plague-phylogeography/results/snippy_pairwise/local/IP283
+
+ /2/scratch/keaton/plague-phylogeography/results/snippy_pairwise/local/IP562
+
+ /2/scratch/keaton/plague-phylogeography/results/snippy_pairwise/local/IP542
+
+ /2/scratch/keaton/plague-phylogeography/results/snippy_pairwise/local/IP543
+
+ /2/scratch/keaton/plague-phylogeography/results/snippy_pairwise/local/IP557
+
+
+ + + + + + + + +
General Statistics
+ + + + + + + + + + Showing 36/36 rows and 23/36 columns. + +| Sample Name | M Reads Mapped | Endogenous DNA (%) | Endogenous DNA Post (%) | % GC | ≥ 3X | ≥ 10X | Median cov | Mean cov | M Aligned | Error rate | 3 Prime G>A 1st base | 5 Prime C>T 1st base | Median read length | % Dups | Variant SNP | Variant INS | Variant DEL | Variant COMPLEX | % Trimmed | M Reads Trimmed | % Dups | % GC | M Seqs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IP283 | 99.21 | 92.60 | 49% | 91.9% | 86.5% | 26.0X | 24.0X | 1.3 | 0.07% | 57.6% | 48 | 4 | 8 | 0 | |||||||||
| IP283_1 | 24.1% | 1.4 | 46.9% | 48% | 2.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
| IP283_2 | 41.3% | 48% | 2.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| IP283_flagstat | 5.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IP283_postfilterflagstat | 5.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IP283_rmdup | 0.0% | 0.0% | 90.00bp | ||||||||||||||||||||
| IP542 | 98.39 | 88.38 | 48% | 86.9% | 84.6% | 31.0X | 28.0X | 1.5 | 0.08% | 63.0% | 231 | 20 | 36 | 2 | |||||||||
| IP542_1 | 26.6% | 1.9 | 54.4% | 48% | 3.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
| IP542_2 | 47.9% | 47% | 3.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| IP542_flagstat | 6.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IP542_postfilterflagstat | 6.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IP542_rmdup | 0.0% | 0.0% | 90.00bp | ||||||||||||||||||||
| IP543 | 98.40 | 88.65 | 49% | 86.8% | 82.1% | 24.0X | 21.7X | 1.1 | 0.08% | 56.8% | 221 | 18 | 30 | 2 | |||||||||
| IP543_1 | 25.2% | 1.3 | 48.2% | 48% | 2.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
| IP543_2 | 42.8% | 48% | 2.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| IP543_flagstat | 4.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IP543_postfilterflagstat | 4.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IP543_rmdup | 0.0% | 0.0% | 90.00bp | ||||||||||||||||||||
| IP557 | 98.85 | 93.30 | 49% | 90.0% | 85.6% | 25.0X | 23.1X | 1.2 | 0.07% | 56.4% | 238 | 20 | 25 | 2 | |||||||||
| IP557_1 | 25.0% | 1.3 | 45.1% | 48% | 2.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
| IP557_2 | 40.5% | 48% | 2.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| IP557_flagstat | 4.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IP557_postfilterflagstat | 4.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IP557_rmdup | 0.0% | 0.0% | 90.00bp | ||||||||||||||||||||
| IP562 | 99.01 | 93.28 | 49% | 89.8% | 85.8% | 29.0X | 26.1X | 1.4 | 0.08% | 59.4% | 231 | 19 | 21 | 2 | |||||||||
| IP562_1 | 25.6% | 1.6 | 48.4% | 48% | 3.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
| IP562_2 | 43.0% | 48% | 3.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| IP562_flagstat | 5.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IP562_postfilterflagstat | 5.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IP562_rmdup | 0.0% | 0.0% | 90.00bp | ||||||||||||||||||||
| IP579 | 66.90 | 63.01 | 48% | 91.1% | 86.8% | 23.0X | 22.0X | 1.2 | 0.07% | 56.0% | 48 | 2 | 9 | 0 | |||||||||
| IP579_1 | 26.8% | 2.1 | 41.3% | 46% | 3.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
| IP579_2 | 38.2% | 45% | 3.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| IP579_flagstat | 4.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IP579_postfilterflagstat | 4.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IP579_rmdup | 0.0% | 0.0% | 90.00bp |
QualiMap
+QualiMap is a platform-independent application to facilitate the quality control of alignment sequencing data and its derivatives like feature counts.
+ + + + ++ Coverage histogram + + + +
+ +Distribution of the number of locations in the reference genome with a given depth of coverage.
For a set of DNA or RNA reads mapped to a reference sequence, such as a genome +or transcriptome, the depth of coverage at a given base position is the number +of high-quality reads that map to the reference at that position +(Sims et al. 2014).
+Bases of a reference sequence (y-axis) are groupped by their depth of coverage +(0×, 1×, …, N×) (x-axis). This plot shows +the frequency of coverage depths relative to the reference sequence for each +read dataset, which provides an indirect measure of the level and variation of +coverage depth in the corresponding sequenced sample.
+If reads are randomly distributed across the reference sequence, this plot +should resemble a Poisson distribution (Lander & Waterman 1988), with a peak indicating approximate +depth of coverage, and more uniform coverage depth being reflected in a narrower +spread. The optimal level of coverage depth depends on the aims of the +experiment, though it should at minimum be sufficiently high to adequately +address the biological question; greater uniformity of coverage is generally +desirable, because it increases breadth of coverage for a given depth of +coverage, allowing equivalent results to be achieved at a lower sequencing depth +(Sampson +et al. 2011; Sims +et al. 2014). However, it is difficult to achieve uniform coverage +depth in practice, due to biases introduced during sample preparation +(van +Dijk et al. 2014), sequencing (Ross et al. 2013) and read mapping +(Sims et al. 2014).
+This plot may include a small peak for regions of the reference sequence with +zero depth of coverage. Such regions may be absent from the given sample (due +to a deletion or structural rearrangement), present in the sample but not +successfully sequenced (due to bias in sequencing or preparation), or sequenced +but not successfully mapped to the reference (due to the choice of mapping +algorithm, the presence of repeat sequences, or mismatches caused by variants +or sequencing errors). Related factors cause most datasets to contain some +unmapped reads (Sims +et al. 2014).
+
+ Cumulative genome coverage + + + +
+ +Percentage of the reference genome with at least the given depth of coverage.
For a set of DNA or RNA reads mapped to a reference sequence, such as a genome +or transcriptome, the depth of coverage at a given base position is the number +of high-quality reads that map to the reference at that position, while the +breadth of coverage is the fraction of the reference sequence to which reads +have been mapped with at least a given depth of coverage +(Sims et al. 2014).
+Defining coverage breadth in terms of coverage depth is useful, because +sequencing experiments typically require a specific minimum depth of coverage +over the region of interest (Sims et al. 2014), so the extent of the reference sequence +that is amenable to analysis is constrained to lie within regions that have +sufficient depth. With inadequate sequencing breadth, it can be difficult to +distinguish the absence of a biological feature (such as a gene) from a lack +of data (Green 2007).
+For increasing coverage depths (1×, 2×, …, N×), +coverage breadth is calculated as the percentage of the reference +sequence that is covered by at least that number of reads, then plots +coverage breadth (y-axis) against coverage depth (x-axis). This plot +shows the relationship between sequencing depth and breadth for each read +dataset, which can be used to gauge, for example, the likely effect of a +minimum depth filter on the fraction of a genome available for analysis.
+
+ GC content distribution + + + +
+ +Each solid line represents the distribution of GC content of mapped reads for a given sample.
GC bias is the difference between the guanine-cytosine content +(GC-content) of a set of sequencing reads and the GC-content of the DNA +or RNA in the original sample. It is a well-known issue with sequencing +systems, and may be introduced by PCR amplification, among other factors +(Benjamini +& Speed 2012; Ross et al. 2013).
+QualiMap calculates the GC-content of individual mapped reads, then +groups those reads by their GC-content (1%, 2%, …, 100%), and +plots the frequency of mapped reads (y-axis) at each level of GC-content +(x-axis). This plot shows the GC-content distribution of mapped reads +for each read dataset, which should ideally resemble that of the +original sample. It can be useful to display the GC-content distribution +of an appropriate reference sequence for comparison, and QualiMap has an +option to do this (see the Qualimap 2 documentation).
+ + + +
Preseq
+Preseq estimates the complexity of a library, showing how many additional + unique reads are sequenced for increasing total read count. + A shallow curve indicates complexity saturation. The dashed line + shows a perfectly complex library where total reads = unique reads.
+ + + + ++ Complexity curve + +
+ +Note that the x axis is trimmed at the point where all the datasets show 80% of their maximum y-value, to avoid ridiculous scales.
+ + + +
DamageProfiler
+DamageProfiler a tool to determine damage patterns on ancient DNA.
+ + + + ++ 3P misincorporation plot + + + +
+ +3' misincorporation plot for G>A substitutions
This plot shows the frequency of G>A substitutions at the 3' read ends. Typically, one would observe high substitution percentages for ancient DNA, whereas modern DNA does not show these in higher extents.
+
+ 5P misincorporation plot + + + +
+ +5' misincorporation plot for C>T substitutions
This plot shows the frequency of C>T substitutions at the 5' read ends. Typically, one would observe high substitution percentages for ancient DNA, whereas modern DNA does not show these in higher extents.
+
+ Forward read length distribution + + + +
+ +Read length distribution for forward strand (+) reads.
This plot shows the read length distribution of the forward reads in the investigated sample. Reads below lengths of 30bp are typically filtered, so the plot doesn't show these in many cases. A shifted distribution of read lengths towards smaller read lengths (e.g around 30-50bp) is also an indicator of ancient DNA.
+
+ Reverse read length distribution + + + +
+ +Read length distribution for reverse strand (-) reads.
This plot shows the read length distribution of the reverse reads in the investigated sample. Reads below lengths of 30bp are typically filtered, so the plot doesn't show these in many cases. A shifted distribution of read lengths towards smaller read lengths (e.g around 30-50bp) is also an indicator of ancient DNA.
+ + + +
Picard
+Picard is a set of Java command line tools for manipulating high-throughput sequencing data.
+ + + + ++ Mark Duplicates + + + +
+ +Number of reads, categorised by duplication state. Pair counts are doubled - see help text for details.
The table in the Picard metrics file contains some columns referring +read pairs and some referring to single reads.
+To make the numbers in this plot sum correctly, values referring to pairs are doubled +according to the scheme below:
+-
+
READS_IN_DUPLICATE_PAIRS = 2 * READ_PAIR_DUPLICATES
+READS_IN_UNIQUE_PAIRS = 2 * (READ_PAIRS_EXAMINED - READ_PAIR_DUPLICATES)
+READS_IN_UNIQUE_UNPAIRED = UNPAIRED_READS_EXAMINED - UNPAIRED_READ_DUPLICATES
+READS_IN_DUPLICATE_PAIRS_OPTICAL = 2 * READ_PAIR_OPTICAL_DUPLICATES
+READS_IN_DUPLICATE_PAIRS_NONOPTICAL = READS_IN_DUPLICATE_PAIRS - READS_IN_DUPLICATE_PAIRS_OPTICAL
+READS_IN_DUPLICATE_UNPAIRED = UNPAIRED_READ_DUPLICATES
+READS_UNMAPPED = UNMAPPED_READS
+
+ + + +
Samtools
+Samtools is a suite of programs for interacting with high-throughput sequencing data.
+ + + + ++ Samtools Flagstat + +
+ +This module parses the output from samtools flagstat. All numbers in millions.
+ + + +
Snippy
+Snippy Rapid haploid variant calling and core genome alignment.
+ + + + ++ Snippy Variants + + + +
+ +Variant type descriptive statistics.
The stacked bar graph shows the different variant types reported +by snippy.
+ + + +
Adapter Removal
+Adapter Removal rapid adapter trimming, identification, and read merging
+ + + + ++ Retained and Discarded Paired-End Collapsed + +
+ +The number of retained and discarded reads.
+
+ Length Distribution Paired End Collapsed + +
+ +The length distribution of reads after processing adapter alignment.
+ + + +
FastQC
+FastQC is a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data, written by Simon Andrews at the Babraham Institute in Cambridge.
+ + + + ++ Sequence Counts + + + +
+ +Sequence counts for each sample. Duplicate read counts are an estimate only.
This plot show the total number of reads, broken down into unique and duplicate +if possible (only more recent versions of FastQC give duplicate info).
+You can read more about duplicate calculation in the +FastQC documentation. +A small part has been copied here for convenience:
+Only sequences which first appear in the first 100,000 sequences +in each file are analysed. This should be enough to get a good impression +for the duplication levels in the whole file. Each sequence is tracked to +the end of the file to give a representative count of the overall duplication level.
+The duplication detection requires an exact sequence match over the whole length of +the sequence. Any reads over 75bp in length are truncated to 50bp for this analysis.
+
+ Sequence Quality Histograms + + + +
+ +The mean quality value across each base position in the read.
To enable multiple samples to be plotted on the same graph, only the mean quality +scores are plotted (unlike the box plots seen in FastQC reports).
+Taken from the FastQC help:
+The y-axis on the graph shows the quality scores. The higher the score, the better +the base call. The background of the graph divides the y axis into very good quality +calls (green), calls of reasonable quality (orange), and calls of poor quality (red). +The quality of calls on most platforms will degrade as the run progresses, so it is +common to see base calls falling into the orange area towards the end of a read.
+
+ Per Sequence Quality Scores + + + +
+ +The number of reads with average quality scores. Shows if a subset of reads has poor quality.
From the FastQC help:
+The per sequence quality score report allows you to see if a subset of your +sequences have universally low quality values. It is often the case that a +subset of sequences will have universally poor quality, however these should +represent only a small percentage of the total sequences.
+
+ Per Base Sequence Content + + + +
+ +The proportion of each base position for which each of the four normal DNA bases has been called.
To enable multiple samples to be shown in a single plot, the base composition data +is shown as a heatmap. The colours represent the balance between the four bases: +an even distribution should give an even muddy brown colour. Hover over the plot +to see the percentage of the four bases under the cursor.
+To see the data as a line plot, as in the original FastQC graph, click on a sample track.
+From the FastQC help:
+Per Base Sequence Content plots out the proportion of each base position in a +file for which each of the four normal DNA bases has been called.
+In a random library you would expect that there would be little to no difference +between the different bases of a sequence run, so the lines in this plot should +run parallel with each other. The relative amount of each base should reflect +the overall amount of these bases in your genome, but in any case they should +not be hugely imbalanced from each other.
+It's worth noting that some types of library will always produce biased sequence +composition, normally at the start of the read. Libraries produced by priming +using random hexamers (including nearly all RNA-Seq libraries) and those which +were fragmented using transposases inherit an intrinsic bias in the positions +at which reads start. This bias does not concern an absolute sequence, but instead +provides enrichement of a number of different K-mers at the 5' end of the reads. +Whilst this is a true technical bias, it isn't something which can be corrected +by trimming and in most cases doesn't seem to adversely affect the downstream +analysis.
Rollover for sample name
+ ++
+ Per Sequence GC Content + + + +
+ +The average GC content of reads. Normal random library typically have a + roughly normal distribution of GC content.
From the FastQC help:
+This module measures the GC content across the whole length of each sequence +in a file and compares it to a modelled normal distribution of GC content.
+In a normal random library you would expect to see a roughly normal distribution +of GC content where the central peak corresponds to the overall GC content of +the underlying genome. Since we don't know the the GC content of the genome the +modal GC content is calculated from the observed data and used to build a +reference distribution.
+An unusually shaped distribution could indicate a contaminated library or +some other kinds of biased subset. A normal distribution which is shifted +indicates some systematic bias which is independent of base position. If there +is a systematic bias which creates a shifted normal distribution then this won't +be flagged as an error by the module since it doesn't know what your genome's +GC content should be.
+
+ Per Base N Content + + + +
+ +The percentage of base calls at each position for which an N was called.
From the FastQC help:
+If a sequencer is unable to make a base call with sufficient confidence then it will
+normally substitute an N rather than a conventional base call. This graph shows the
+percentage of base calls at each position for which an N was called.
It's not unusual to see a very low proportion of Ns appearing in a sequence, especially +nearer the end of a sequence. However, if this proportion rises above a few percent +it suggests that the analysis pipeline was unable to interpret the data well enough to +make valid base calls.
+
+ Sequence Length Distribution + +
+ ++
+ Sequence Duplication Levels + + + +
+ +The relative level of duplication found for every sequence.
From the FastQC Help:
+In a diverse library most sequences will occur only once in the final set. +A low level of duplication may indicate a very high level of coverage of the +target sequence, but a high level of duplication is more likely to indicate +some kind of enrichment bias (eg PCR over amplification). This graph shows +the degree of duplication for every sequence in a library: the relative +number of sequences with different degrees of duplication.
+Only sequences which first appear in the first 100,000 sequences +in each file are analysed. This should be enough to get a good impression +for the duplication levels in the whole file. Each sequence is tracked to +the end of the file to give a representative count of the overall duplication level.
+The duplication detection requires an exact sequence match over the whole length of +the sequence. Any reads over 75bp in length are truncated to 50bp for this analysis.
+In a properly diverse library most sequences should fall into the far left of the +plot in both the red and blue lines. A general level of enrichment, indicating broad +oversequencing in the library will tend to flatten the lines, lowering the low end +and generally raising other categories. More specific enrichments of subsets, or +the presence of low complexity contaminants will tend to produce spikes towards the +right of the plot.
+
+ Overrepresented sequences + + + +
+ +The total amount of overrepresented sequences found in each library.
FastQC calculates and lists overrepresented sequences in FastQ files. It would not be +possible to show this for all samples in a MultiQC report, so instead this plot shows +the number of sequences categorized as over represented.
+Sometimes, a single sequence may account for a large number of reads in a dataset. +To show this, the bars are split into two: the first shows the overrepresented reads +that come from the single most common sequence. The second shows the total count +from all remaining overrepresented sequences.
+From the FastQC Help:
+A normal high-throughput library will contain a diverse set of sequences, with no +individual sequence making up a tiny fraction of the whole. Finding that a single +sequence is very overrepresented in the set either means that it is highly biologically +significant, or indicates that the library is contaminated, or not as diverse as you expected.
+FastQC lists all of the sequences which make up more than 0.1% of the total. +To conserve memory only sequences which appear in the first 100,000 sequences are tracked +to the end of the file. It is therefore possible that a sequence which is overrepresented +but doesn't appear at the start of the file for some reason could be missed by this module.
+
+ Adapter Content + + + +
+ +The cumulative percentage count of the proportion of your + library which has seen each of the adapter sequences at each position.
Note that only samples with ≥ 0.1% adapter contamination are shown.
+There may be several lines per sample, as one is shown for each adapter +detected in the file.
+From the FastQC Help:
+The plot shows a cumulative percentage count of the proportion +of your library which has seen each of the adapter sequences at each position. +Once a sequence has been seen in a read it is counted as being present +right through to the end of the read so the percentages you see will only +increase as the read length goes on.
+
+ Status Checks + + + +
+ +Status for each FastQC section showing whether results seem entirely normal (green), +slightly abnormal (orange) or very unusual (red).
FastQC assigns a status for each section of the report. +These give a quick evaluation of whether the results of the analysis seem +entirely normal (green), slightly abnormal (orange) or very unusual (red).
+It is important to stress that although the analysis results appear to give a pass/fail result, +these evaluations must be taken in the context of what you expect from your library. +A 'normal' sample as far as FastQC is concerned is random and diverse. +Some experiments may be expected to produce libraries which are biased in particular ways. +You should treat the summary evaluations therefore as pointers to where you should concentrate +your attention and understand why your library may not look random and diverse.
+Specific guidance on how to interpret the output of each module can be found in the relevant +report section, or in the FastQC help.
+In this heatmap, we summarise all of these into a single heatmap for a quick overview. +Note that not all FastQC sections have plots in MultiQC reports, but all status checks +are shown in this heatmap.
+