Consider changing default tls stack from openssl-tls
to rustls-tls
#1192
Labels
question
Direction unclear; possibly a bug, possibly could be improved.
If the latest mass-closure of rustls issues does not come with any negative side-effects, we should consider finally moving over to
rustls
as a default.Issue comparison
Feature Comparison
Based on above issues; moving now would give us default support for
tls-server-name
.It could also potentially give us a much faster windows ci (experimentation pending) due to how long the openssl install takes.
Cross compilation
Minor point, but the standard glibc based x86_64 linux -> musl x86_64 cross compile technically becomes viable locally without build containers using
cargo build --target x86_64-unknown-linux-musl
(works inversion-rs
which is now usingrustls-tls
).Questions
rustls
overopenssl
that we should take into consideration?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: