Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The operators directory is a bit out of date #2072

Closed
tenzen-y opened this issue Dec 24, 2022 · 4 comments · Fixed by #2161
Closed

The operators directory is a bit out of date #2072

tenzen-y opened this issue Dec 24, 2022 · 4 comments · Fixed by #2161

Comments

@tenzen-y
Copy link
Member

/kind discussion

Describe the solution you'd like
[A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.]
The operators directory corresponds to katib v0.12.0, which is a bit out of date.

Also, it looks like the latest Charmed katib-operator exists at https://github.com/canonical/katib-operators. Those Charmed katib-operators don't seem to sync. This situation is likely to be confusing for users.

@DomFleischmann @DnPlas @ca-scribner @knkski Would you like to keep maintaining both kubeflow/katib/operators and canonical/katib-operators? Or would you like to remove Charmed katib-operator from this repository (katib repo)?

/cc @kubeflow/wg-automl-leads

Anything else you would like to add:
[Miscellaneous information that will assist in solving the issue.]


Love this feature? Give it a 👍 We prioritize the features with the most 👍

@tenzen-y
Copy link
Member Author

@ca-scribner
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @tenzen-y, I'll raise this in the team

@tenzen-y
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @tenzen-y, I'll raise this in the team

Thanks!

@ca-scribner
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry for the really slow action on this. We think the easiest thing is to just remove the operators, which I'd guess you'll appreciate too to add stability to your CI ;) I've opened #2161 do action this change

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants