Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some generated methods lacking ConfigureAwait(false) #1555

Open
brianpursley opened this issue May 6, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

Some generated methods lacking ConfigureAwait(false) #1555

brianpursley opened this issue May 6, 2024 · 6 comments
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@brianpursley
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the bug
I was looking at something else and noticed some of the generated methods lack a ConfigureAwait(false) and do not dispose _result like the other methods do.

Here is the code I'm referring to:

var _result = await operations.{{GetMethodName api.operation "WithHttpMessagesAsync"}}(
{{ for parameter in api.operation.parameters}}
{{GetDotNetNameOpenApiParameter parameter "false"}},
{{end}}
null,
cancellationToken);

Is this by design, or should it have ConfigureAwait(false) and using var _result like the other operations?

Kubernetes C# SDK Client Version
v13

Server Kubernetes Version
n/a

Dotnet Runtime Version
n/a

To Reproduce
n/a

Expected behavior
n/a

KubeConfig
n/a

Where do you run your app with Kubernetes SDK (please complete the following information):
n/a

Additional context
n/a

@tg123
Copy link
Member

tg123 commented May 6, 2024

good catch could you please send pr to fix

@brianpursley
Copy link
Contributor Author

good catch could you please send pr to fix

Sure.

/assign

@brianpursley
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looking into it a little more, I don't think these methods actually work, or don't work anymore if they did previously.

When I try to use ConnectGetNamespacedPodExecAsync, I get an HTTP 400 error with the message Upgrade request required.

So I'm guessing this is a bigger issue, that the client should support handling an upgrade request from the server, to switch to websockets (probably not worth worrying about SPDY at this point since it is being deprecated).

I see that there already is a client.WebSocketNamespacedPodExecAsync and it works, but it is not generated from the swagger. I don't know, maybe this is sufficient for the purposes of this client, but if that is the case, what, if anything should be done with the generated methods that don't work?

I'll take a look at it a little more when I get some time, to see how handling the upgrade might work. Maybe I'll look at some of the other clients to see what they're doing.

@tg123
Copy link
Member

tg123 commented May 8, 2024

cleaning up watch and streaming (connect) is on my todo list for long
the first step is to refactor the template system which got merge recently

however, i believe websocket related is still working as you tested.
another todo is to support http2

thanks for reporting it

@brianpursley brianpursley removed their assignment May 22, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 20, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Sep 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants