Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CSI controller Health Check doesn't properly validate controller health. #1551

Open
stobias123 opened this issue Mar 28, 2023 · 8 comments
Open
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.

Comments

@stobias123
Copy link

/kind bug

What happened?
Volumes could not attach. I had a combination of these two errors. After restarting the CSI driver deployment, the volumes attached properly.

E0328 19:16:27.445502       1 driver.go:120] "GRPC error" err="rpc error: code = Internal desc = Could not attach volume \"vol-02a81309e3377eebb\" to node \"i-0c9f3cd3ae6b2d20d\": attachment of disk \"vol-02a81309e3377eebb\" failed, expected device to be attached but was attaching"
I0328 19:16:58.979598       1 cloud.go:611] "Ignoring error from describe volume, will retry" volumeID="vol-02a81309e3377eebb" err=<
        RequestCanceled: request context canceled
        caused by: context deadline exceeded

What you expected to happen?

I'd expect this time out failure to surface in the healthcheck and cause the pod to be restarted. If the healthcheck fails, and restarts the pod, things would have auto healed without user input.

How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)?

Anything else we need to know?:
I had a support case open for this. 12358592881.

Environment

  • Kubernetes version (use kubectl version): v1.23.16-eks-48e63af
  • Driver version: v1.17.0-eksbuild.1
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Mar 28, 2023
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 26, 2023
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jan 19, 2024
@AndrewSirenko
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Feb 5, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 5, 2024
@stobias123
Copy link
Author

Bummer! Any reason we can't keep this open? I think my concern is still valid here.

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jun 5, 2024
@AndrewSirenko
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@stobias123 yes we should be keeping this open. I'll bring this issue back up at today's standup. Thank you for your patience.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Jun 6, 2024
@kubernetes-sigs kubernetes-sigs deleted a comment from k8s-ci-robot Jun 6, 2024
@kubernetes-sigs kubernetes-sigs deleted a comment from k8s-ci-robot Jun 6, 2024
@AndrewSirenko
Copy link
Contributor

/priority important-longterm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. label Jun 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants