Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for Installing Multiple Infrastructures in Helm Chart (GCP and AWS) with Tutorial #535

Open
kahirokunn opened this issue May 24, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one.

Comments

@kahirokunn
Copy link

User Story

As a developer, I would like to install multiple infrastructures using Helm charts for better management and deployment consistency across GCP and AWS.

Detailed Description

I would like to request the feature to support installing multiple infrastructures (e.g., GCP and AWS) using Helm charts. This could be implemented either by enhancing a single Helm chart to handle multiple providers or by providing separate Helm charts for each provider. Additionally, a comprehensive tutorial on how to configure and deploy these Helm charts for multi-cloud environments would be highly beneficial. This tutorial should cover the necessary steps, configurations, and best practices for managing infrastructure components across GCP and AWS.

Anything else you would like to add:

This feature and accompanying tutorial would greatly benefit users who manage multi-cloud environments, ensuring a unified and streamlined process for infrastructure deployment. It would also reduce the complexity of maintaining separate Helm charts for each provider, providing clear guidance on how to achieve this setup.

/kind feature

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels May 24, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If CAPI Operator contributors determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 22, 2024
@kahirokunn
Copy link
Author

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants