Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disable builtin ssl_session_cache #7777

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2021

Conversation

sepich
Copy link
Contributor

@sepich sepich commented Oct 8, 2021

What this PR does / why we need it:

Fix for: #7080
From docs:

builtin
a cache built in OpenSSL; Use of the built-in cache can cause memory fragmentation.

using only shared cache without the built-in cache should be more efficient.

One could still set builtin if needed via ssl-session-cache-size

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation only

Which issue/s this PR fixes

fixes #7080

How Has This Been Tested?

Tested via overriding whole nginx.tmpl
image

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I've read the CONTRIBUTION guide
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

Signed-off-by: Alex R <i@sepa.spb.ru>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. labels Oct 8, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @sepich!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/ingress-nginx 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/ingress-nginx has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @sepich. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-priority size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 8, 2021
@strongjz
Copy link
Member

strongjz commented Oct 8, 2021

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Oct 8, 2021
@strongjz
Copy link
Member

strongjz commented Oct 8, 2021

/kind bug
/triage accepted

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. and removed needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Oct 8, 2021
@rikatz
Copy link
Contributor

rikatz commented Oct 8, 2021

woooaaa good catch @sepich

I will reserve some time later just to check some future impact, otherwise lgtm

@ElvinEfendi
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

We have been running without builtin SSL caching for a long time already at my company. For some reason I had an impression that I upstream'd the change, but apparently I did not 😄

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 8, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ElvinEfendi, sepich

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 8, 2021
@ElvinEfendi
Copy link
Member

/hold

I meant to only lgtm, not approve. I'll let another maintainer to approve too before we merge this.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 8, 2021
@rikatz
Copy link
Contributor

rikatz commented Oct 8, 2021

/hold cancel
Well, I think we can merge this

@sepich thanks for sticking with us and finding a fix for this bug!

@strongjz is going to make a live release on Kubecon next week (kidding, we can work on this during the weekend!)

Remember to cherry-pick this to "legacy" branch as this gets merged so we can implement this bug fix on 0.X as well

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 8, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 9e3c528 into kubernetes:main Oct 8, 2021
@sepich sepich mentioned this pull request Oct 8, 2021
9 tasks
@sepich
Copy link
Contributor Author

sepich commented Oct 8, 2021

Remember to cherry-pick this to "legacy" branch as this gets merged so we can implement this bug fix on 0.X as well

Sure, #7779

@rikatz rikatz added this to the v1.0.4 milestone Oct 10, 2021
rchshld pushed a commit to joomcode/ingress-nginx that referenced this pull request May 19, 2023
Signed-off-by: Alex R <i@sepa.spb.ru>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

NGINX ingress creating endless core dumps
5 participants