Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compute server_names_hash_bucket_size correctly #624

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2017

Conversation

justinsb
Copy link
Member

There were some edge cases where we did not calculate hash_bucket_size
correctly.

Fix #623

There were some edge cases where we did not calculate hash_bucket_size
correctly.

Fix kubernetes#623
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Apr 19, 2017
@k8s-reviewable
Copy link

This change is Reviewable

@aledbf aledbf added the nginx label Apr 19, 2017
@aledbf aledbf self-assigned this Apr 19, 2017
@aledbf
Copy link
Member

aledbf commented Apr 19, 2017

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 19, 2017
@aledbf
Copy link
Member

aledbf commented Apr 19, 2017

@justinsb thanks for this and the explanation in 623!

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 47.491% when pulling 322be61 on justinsb:fix_623 into 827e6f1 on kubernetes:master.

@aledbf aledbf merged commit c34c16b into kubernetes:master Apr 19, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. nginx
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants