Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Moving Gcsweb to CNCF Infrastructure #204

Closed
bartsmykla opened this issue Feb 26, 2019 · 9 comments
Closed

Moving Gcsweb to CNCF Infrastructure #204

bartsmykla opened this issue Feb 26, 2019 · 9 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/infra Infrastructure management, infrastructure design, code in infra/ priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release.

Comments

@bartsmykla
Copy link
Contributor

As one of the tasks is to moving Gcsweb to CNCF Infrastructure (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1r0nydnBoU7o_L7Hnjdc9SZrWe9zosbz64ZUUPn0XwXk)
I would like to take this task and work on it.

@thockin, @ixdy - could you maybe give me a hand with the issue?

@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented Mar 4, 2019

/assign @bartsmykla

@bartsmykla
Copy link
Contributor Author

@spiffxp, @thockin, @ixdy who should I poke to get some informations about cluster, where Gcsweb should be moved to (especially related to access)?

@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Mar 12, 2019

/assign @thockin @ixdy

Tim, Jeff, can you please pull the existing manifests and let @bartsmykla take a peek?

@ixdy
Copy link
Member

ixdy commented Mar 12, 2019

The existing manifests are in the gcsweb.k8s.io/ directory of this repo, currently running in the same Kubernetes cluster that we run the k8s.io redirector (and to which I recently deployed cert-manager). It runs in the gcsweb namespace, but I don't think that's encoded in the checked-in manifests (for whatever reason).

We don't really have any turnup scripts or anything, though I think you'd run into trouble creating the ingress right now due to cert-manager/cert-manager#1343. I guess if we update to cert-manager 0.7 that shouldn't be an issue, though.

I don't know where this would run in CNCF infrastructure.

@thockin
Copy link
Member

thockin commented Mar 13, 2019 via email

@spiffxp spiffxp added this to the migrate-low-risk milestone Apr 30, 2019
@spiffxp spiffxp added the area/infra Infrastructure management, infrastructure design, code in infra/ label May 1, 2019
@thockin thockin added priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. and removed priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. labels Jul 8, 2019
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Jul 24, 2019

needs a cluster

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 22, 2019
@cblecker
Copy link
Member

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 22, 2019
@thockin
Copy link
Member

thockin commented Dec 11, 2019

DONE

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/infra Infrastructure management, infrastructure design, code in infra/ priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants