Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tsreport incorrectly asserts DTS 'errors' #21

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 17, 2015 · 1 comment
Open

tsreport incorrectly asserts DTS 'errors' #21

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 17, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Create a TS with no DTS
2. 'tsreport -cnt <pid>'

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Using my example transport stream I get the output:
### PID(512): DTS (7150612428t) < PCR (7150612509t)

Given that I don't have DTS in my transport:
  PES header
    Start code:        00 00 01
    Stream ID:         c0   (192) SYSTEM START: Audio stream 00
    PES packet length: 0192 (402)
    Flags:             84 80 data-aligned : PTS
    PES header len 15
    PTS 7146951508

I would not expect a value for DTS, also it would seem odd that this warning 
would be generated. It would make seem to me to skip DTS validation if the 
PTS/DTS flags were '10'.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?

TS tools version 1.11, tsreport built Jan  3 2009 17:20:54
Debian Wheezy, Ubuntu 12.04, Centos 6.3 and AmazonAMI

Please provide any additional information below.

Sorry, I can't provide a patch; It's unfortunately beyond my current level of C.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by c...@gryning.com on 12 Dec 2012 at 1:03

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Note that DTS is implied to be equal to PTS if DTS is not present. So if PTS < 
PCR that would also imply DTS < PCR.

Original comment by piers.sc...@ericsson.com on 15 Mar 2013 at 1:02

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant