You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The scaling is not yet clearly defined in the NMEA protocol. Do my assumptions fit here?
Ballast (1.00 - 1.60) <= would it make sense to simply transfer a value in KG here? What is the appropriate value range here (i.e. maximum ballast)?
Bugs in % (0 - 30) <= In XCSOAR / Opensoar I find a setting between 0 ... 50 %. (0 == clean, 50% wet surface "double sink rate") Which value range/scaling do you recommend here?
Crew weight is still missing I think. Would 0 ... 300kg fit?
Switching between climb and pre-flight mode? Our front end can currently be switched manually or use the information from the sensor. Should this be coupled with XCSOAR?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The aircraft polar models in the front end and in XCSoar are similar but not the same. XCSoar, for example, does not recognize a pilot weight.
The definition of the NMEA data sets was based on other existing connections. We cannot start from scratch here.
There is currently no polar alignment between the front end and XCSoar. This is complex and currently out of scope.
In Detail:
Ballast: The definition of ballast as a multiple of the usual take-off weight is sufficient.
Bugs in %: We can expand it to 50%, but i think this is not necessary
Crew weight: is not known by xcsoar, so we can't exchange it
Switching between climb and pre-flight: I don't see any point in defining a data set here, as XCSaoar switches this automatically and intervention here may be problematic.
To summarize. I see no need for action here at present. Our goal should be to get the defined functionality up and running. This already covers the most important points.
Max Betz wrote:
Ballast (1.00 - 1.60) <= would it make sense to simply transfer a value in KG here? What is the appropriate value range here (i.e. maximum ballast)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: