Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support access specifiers #18

Open
lawmurray opened this issue Aug 3, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Support access specifiers #18

lawmurray opened this issue Aug 3, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@lawmurray
Copy link
Owner

It would be good to support access specifiers, i.e. public, protected and private in classes.

Suggestions welcome on how to handle this from a presentation perspective, e.g. tagging each entity with its access specifier (if any), or grouping members of a class by access specifier.
@lawmurray lawmurray added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 3, 2023
@tocic
Copy link

tocic commented Aug 3, 2023

I like how it's done in SFML using doxygen: public members don't get any labels (most of your documented API will be public), but protected ones do (compare this and this).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@lawmurray @tocic