Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

duplicate functionality? #156

Open
jaycedowell opened this issue Nov 12, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

duplicate functionality? #156

jaycedowell opened this issue Nov 12, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@jaycedowell
Copy link
Collaborator

@telegraphic has noted that both bifrost.block and bifrost.pipeline provide the same functionality. There are also several other places in Bifrost where this seems to happen:

  • DataType.py vs. dtype.py
  • ring.py vs. ring2.py
  • block.py vs. pipeline.py
    We should look through these pairs to (1) see if they are indeed duplicating functionality and (2) if so, which one gets eliminated. @telegraphic has already voted to remove block.py.
@jaycedowell
Copy link
Collaborator Author

For a FYI on ring.py vs. ring2.py: ring.py is currently in use for the tutorials. I also use it extensively in my code that uses the lower level Python API.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant