-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Coveralls is returning 422 Unprocessable Entity #279
Comments
Same bug here. Any insight? |
I am having the same issue with Private Repositories on Travis-Pro. I had an existing repository, which was already sending reports to coveralls, re-run a build and it failed to send data. Added a new repository, same issue. |
@cmaurer that approach did not work with |
Hi all we're looking into this issue now! |
Ok, found the cause, Travis-Pro rolled all of their API tokens for heartbleed; I've done the same on our side. Please log in again to Coveralls to make sure we have a valid Github token, then the next job that we process will update our Travis-Pro token. Thank you everyone for your patience! |
Worked! Thanks @nickmerwin |
Thanks! 👍 |
Hi guys, I'm still seeing this issue (on travis-pro)
still returns 422. If I don't set service_name then it does update the coveralls repo with my coverage stats, however, it seems to find the build information for a random travis-ci job. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Am I missing something? |
@charliequinn hi, could you send me the name of the repo on which this is occurring here: support@coveralls.io ? |
Thanks Nick I've sent the name of the repo, plus json sent and response to support. |
Seems like we have this issue when a fork of our private repo is built, if that helps. These don't normally get built by Travis, but they do in case of a pull request. edit: this is because Travis doesn't expose secure tokens on a PR build. |
Running
rake coveralls:push
from Travis shows a 422 error with the following body:{"message":"Couldn't find a repository matching this job.","error":true}
Nothing changed on our end.
I regenerated the Coveralls token (and updated
.coveralls.yml
accordingly); this made no difference.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: