You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
seven-phases-max
changed the title
Weird results of comparision of different types with <, > and similar operators.
Weird results of comparision of non-numeric types with <, > and similar operators.
May 14, 2014
seven-phases-max
changed the title
Weird results of comparision of non-numeric types with <, > and similar operators.
Weird results of comparison of non-numeric types with <, > and similar operators.
May 14, 2014
Yes, ive noticed this before. My vote is it should return false. The
current line is that a mixin should use the is functions if doing a <, >
comparison.
(this is more like a self-note that the comparison subsystem probably needs some not-so-minor refactoring).
Example:
Result:
Expected result: error? false?
Related issues: #1725 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: