Exception raised on waiting for all jobs to finish

[roybh1]

Hi,
We are using this plugin to wait on all checks on pull request to allow dynamic CI jobs with BORS (merge queuing)
The step sometimes fail on:
/usr/bin/docker run --name e4f55beca1679d4d5e9e170cc080dc764b_ec7072 --label 5588e4 --workdir /github/workspace --rm -e INPUT_REF -e INPUT_REPO-TOKEN -e INPUT_WAIT-INTERVAL -e INPUT_RUNNING-WORKFLOW-NAME -e INPUT_CHECK-NAME -e HOME -e GITHUB_JOB -e GITHUB_REF -e GITHUB_SHA -e GITHUB_REPOSITORY -e GITHUB_REPOSITORY_OWNER -e GITHUB_RUN_ID -e GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER -e GITHUB_RETENTION_DAYS -e GITHUB_ACTOR -e GITHUB_WORKFLOW -e GITHUB_HEAD_REF -e GITHUB_BASE_REF -e GITHUB_EVENT_NAME -e GITHUB_SERVER_URL -e GITHUB_API_URL -e GITHUB_GRAPHQL_URL -e GITHUB_WORKSPACE -e GITHUB_ACTION -e GITHUB_EVENT_PATH -e GITHUB_ACTION_REPOSITORY -e GITHUB_ACTION_REF -e GITHUB_PATH -e GITHUB_ENV -e RUNNER_OS -e RUNNER_TOOL_CACHE -e RUNNER_TEMP -e RUNNER_WORKSPACE -e ACTIONS_RUNTIME_URL -e ACTIONS_RUNTIME_TOKEN -e ACTIONS_CACHE_URL -e GITHUB_ACTIONS=true -e CI=true -v "/var/run/docker.sock":"/var/run/docker.sock" -v "/home/runner/work/_temp/_github_home":"/github/home" -v "/home/runner/work/_temp/_github_workflow":"/github/workflow" -v "/home/runner/work/_temp/_runner_file_commands":"/github/file_commands" -v "/home/runner/work/epsagon-backend/epsagon-backend":"/github/workspace" 5588e4:f55beca1679d4d5e9e170cc080dc764b "" "" "***" "5" "jobs-ended" /entrypoint.rb:23:in query_check_status': undefined method reject' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError) from /entrypoint.rb:34:in

'`

The step is defined as:
jobs: jobs-ended: runs-on: ubuntu-20.04 steps: - name: Wait on tests uses: lewagon/wait-on-check-action@v0.2 with: ref: ${{ github.event.after }} # can be commit SHA or tag too repo-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} wait-interval: 20 running-workflow-name: "jobs-ended"

[progapandist]

Hi! Please try using lewagon/wait-on-check-action@master, a lot of things has been fixed since the release and it's hight time I bump a version (still can't get to it though). Tell me if it solved your problem :)

[matiasalbarello]

Hi @roybh1. Could you confirm that this issue persists using the last version (v1.1.0)? Thanks!