From 121fed8bfd3377398e4cea2dcf18c0f1cdb12445 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Milan Lenco Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 11:50:54 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Document application network interface order Describe both the legacy and the user-enforced interface ordering with all its limitations. Signed-off-by: Milan Lenco --- docs/APP-CONNECTIVITY.md | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/APP-CONNECTIVITY.md b/docs/APP-CONNECTIVITY.md index b9906b407a..dce07389cf 100644 --- a/docs/APP-CONNECTIVITY.md +++ b/docs/APP-CONNECTIVITY.md @@ -10,13 +10,59 @@ Network connectivity is enabled for an application by configuring one or more ne These consists of [virtual network interfaces](#virtual-network-interfaces), connecting application with [network instances](#network-instances), and directly assigned [physical NIC](#physical-network-ports) or [SR-IOV virtual functions](#sr-iov-vfs). -The order of network adapter configurations inside `AppInstanceConfig` matters, because this -is the same order at which these network adapters will be presented to the application by the -Virtual Machine Manager (VMM). -This order is reflected in the PCI addresses of the adapters. It is important to note that VIFs -and direct assignments are configured in two separate lists. The VMM is configured to present -VIFs first, adhering to their configured order, followed by direct assignments in their respective -order. User cannot enforce direct assignment to appear before VIF. + +### Interface order + +To match an application's network interface with its logical representation from the configuration, +using MAC addresses is recommended. For virtual network interfaces, users can configure MAC +addresses for easier interface identification. Meanwhile, directly assigned NICs are passed +through to applications with their original MAC addresses unchanged. + +However, since MAC addresses differ across a fleet of devices, having a predictable application +network interface order provides a simpler and more scalable matching solution. +But there are two main challenges related to application interface ordering, which make this method +less recommended: + +#### 1. Interface Order Configuration Limitations + +Virtual and directly assigned NICs are configured in two separate lists within `AppInstanceConfig`: +`Interfaces` (VIFs) and `Adapters` (direct assignments, including physical NICs and SR-IOV virtual +functions). Until EVE version 13.8.0, it was not possible to configure the order between items +of these two lists. Consequently, EVE would configure the VMM to present the VIFs first, followed +by direct assignments. While directly assigned NICs adhered to the `Adapters` list order, virtual +interfaces were ordered based on the lowest ACL rule ID assigned to each VIF. This caused undesired +behavior when ACL rule IDs (assigned by the controller) did not align with the user-defined VIF order. +Furthermore, VIFs without ACLs (rather useless interfaces since all traffic is blocked) were +represented with an ACL ID of 0 and always placed first in the interface list. + +EVE version 13.8.0 addressed this by allowing users to define the desired position of each VIF and +directly assigned network devices. This is propagated from controller to EVE via the `InterfaceOrder` +fields with unique (integer) values across both the `Interfaces` and `Adapters` lists. To maintain +backward compatibility and avoid changing interface order in existing deployments, the user-defined +order is applied only if `VmConfig.EnforceNetworkInterfaceOrder` is set to true. Otherwise, EVE +defaults to the legacy behavior described above. + +#### 2. Hypervisor Limitations + +The second, more fundamental challenge lies in the hypervisor's limited ability to control the order +of network interfaces inside VM applications. The actual interface order depends on the application OS, +and EVE cannot guarantee the desired outcome. + +For the KVM hypervisor, EVE attempts to enforce legacy or user-defined orders via the virtualized +PCI topology. Devices expected to appear earlier in the interface list are assigned lower PCI +addresses. This generally works for Linux-based systems, especially those using +the [systemd's naming scheme](https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/latest/systemd.net-naming-scheme.html). +However, some limitations persist: + +* Devices of different types (e.g., Wi-Fi adapters vs. Ethernet NICs) often receive distinct name + prefixes from the application OS, making reordering impossible. +* Multifunction PCI devices must have all functions connected to the same PCI bridge and cannot be + interleaved with other devices. If a user places a VIF or another NIC between functions + of a multifunction device (with `EnforceNetworkInterfaceOrder` enabled), EVE will return an error, + and the application will not be deployed. + +For Xen and KubeVirt hypervisors, application interface order is undefined, and +`EnforceNetworkInterfaceOrder` is not yet supported. ### Physical network ports