-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Beat itest [2/3]: document and fix itest flakes #9307
base: yy-beat-itest-shuffle
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are limited to specific labels. 🏷️ Labels to auto review (1)
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Pull reviewers statsStats of the last 30 days for lnd:
|
b1011ac
to
d8d2a54
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Amazing bug fixes, thank you so much! Crazy how many flakes you were to investigate and fix! You're my absolute hero 💯
c6819c0
to
3c60868
Compare
a558fe3
to
3ac3b53
Compare
3c60868
to
abda3ce
Compare
3ac3b53
to
8abca8c
Compare
abda3ce
to
21082c5
Compare
8abca8c
to
6f59050
Compare
21082c5
to
9374711
Compare
6f59050
to
9c24fc0
Compare
9374711
to
e7beb0a
Compare
So it's easier to get the logs and debug.
We previously didn't see this issue because we always have nodes being over-funded.
So we know which open channel operation failed.
We need to mine an empty block as the tx may already have entered the mempool. This should be fixed once we start using the sweeper to handle the justice tx.
The reconnection will happen automatically when the nodes have a channel, so we just ensure the connection instead of reconnecting directly.
So we won't forget to assert the topology after opening a chain of channels.
This is no longer needed since we don't have standby nodes, plus it's causing panic in windows build due to `edge.Policy` being nil.
This has been seen in the itest which can lead to the node startup failure, ``` 2024-11-20 18:55:15.727 [INF] RPCS: Max websocket clients exceeded [25] - disconnecting client 127.0.0.1:57224 ```
This is needed so we can have one place to fix the flakes found in the MPP-related tests, which is fixed in the following commit.
We now make sure the channel participants have heard their private channel when opening channels.
9c24fc0
to
a6b616e
Compare
Check #9306 for context, and #9260 for the final result.
Changes in each commit is pretty small, major changes are,
flatten some tests so it's easier to debug.
We encountered issue [bug]: listunspent shows spent outputs #8786 - which should have been caught way easier if we didn't use the standby nodes, and is now temporarily hacked. This will be my high-priority item to fix.
when checking for the sweeping tx, if the tx is RBFed, the old txid won't work.
connect to an already connected node can result in an error.
increase payment timeout for sql.
assert channel is in the grapb before sending payments.
assert outgoing and incoming HTLCs separately.
increase
rpcmaxwebsockets
forbtcd
.document the MPP flake - we now have a much better understanding of how it happened.
some other minor refactors.