-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
collision partner IDs #192
Comments
As far as I know, it should work; for example, there's no special 'H2-ness' in collision partner ID 1. But @allegroLeiden knows these parts of code much better than I do. |
Some of the messages do refer to the default LAMDA partner names, but that doesn't affect calculations. |
That is what I thought, thanks! |
Sorry not to comment before but I have been working pretty hard trying to recover from a multiple disk failure. Technically I think this ought to work but I don't think it is a very elegant way to do things. I'll have a think about it when I have some time and see if I can't come up with a better way. We definitely ought to have a mechanism to accommodate users who don't want to be restricted to LAMDA. |
Using |
As a quick fix, I think it would be enough if you change the value of |
@tlunttil that is a good workaround. |
Maybe we could allow the user to submit a list of names and default to LAMDA if it is not supplied? |
The user parameter
collPartIds
is used to match the densities of collisional partners with the rates listed in the LAMDA data file. I have collisional partners that are not one of the 7 species defined in LAMDA ("H2","p-H2","o-H2","electrons","H","He","H+") so I am reusing those IDs for matching the datafiles to the density values. It looks like this should work for any molecules whencollPartIds
andnMolWeights
are set but I may have missed something. Is there any reason why using different collisional partners from the valid LAMDA ones may break something?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: