Review potential additional character substitutions

[ryannewington]

char subsitution:

can the following be added?
6 --> b (g?)
3 --> e or m or w
9 --> g or q
! --> i or l
1 --> i or l
7 --> j or t
5 --> s

• (plus) --> t

is it even possible to have multiple replacement options like for example the "3". I can imagine that can turn into a nightmare as you would end up with multiple (if not many due to exponential increase) passwords to check against the store

Originally posted by @zjorz in #22 (comment)

[ryannewington]

#34 (comment)

[ryannewington]

From @EnviableOne

Link to Hashcat's leetspeak rule: these 21 are the most common password substitutions used and should increase the hitrate on banned words.
For those not uptodate on hashcat syntax, s is the substitute directive and the following character is substituted for the one following so sa4 is swap a for 4
this rulle would generate a couple of normalisation candidates, 9 could be g or q, and if adding the missing to the current rule set 6 can be b or g