Put together a docker image for those who are interested

[gjreasoner]

I put together a docker image to help build bud apps CI/CD style, might save people some time if they want some inspiration;

https://github.com/gjrdiesel/bud-docker

• I had a slight issue with the deployed binary saying it was missing go.mod, I suggested packaging that up, will try to look into whats going on with that later (open to PRs!)
• It's probably much larger then it needs to be by using buster images but it gets the job done

Once the port issue is decided, I'll put a demo up of a running bud server on heroku, blocked at the moment I think by heroku expecting PORT env to be a single port.

Also if you plan on using a volume mount for this docker image, you might be blocked until this issue is resolved.

Loving the framework so far Matt! Looking forward to learning more and thanks for sharing!

[matthewmueller]

Wow, thanks Justin! 🥰

I had a slight issue with the deployed binary saying it was missing go.mod, I suggested packaging that up, will try to look into whats going on with that later (open to PRs!)

Oh interesting, so bud build definitely relies on go.mod being present, but I wouldn't expect the bud/app binary to rely on it if that bud/app was built with bud build and not bud run. Not sure if that makes sense. Happy to clarify.

It's probably much larger then it needs to be by using buster images but it gets the job done

Thanks for kicking this off. Ignition takes more energy than cruising. (Just made that up, not even sure if that's true haha.)

---

We'll get the linked issues resolved soon!

[syke99]

Nice work!!

You mentioned the image is pretty large at the moment due to using a buster image to build on top of. Just curious what caused the need for building in a buster image (I’m really new to Docker). Is it because of bud depending on Node.js? If so, it seems there projected path is to remove Node.js in v0.3.0. And then, maybe you could just use a go alpine image?