Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The UI could use some improvements #825

Closed
mrchief opened this issue Apr 29, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

The UI could use some improvements #825

mrchief opened this issue Apr 29, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@mrchief
Copy link

mrchief commented Apr 29, 2020

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

  • It is very hard to find anything in the UI because of the layout and color combination. Everything looks kinda the same.
  • The response area doesn't need to be laid out linearly - it eats up real estate and forces a scroll to see the response

image

Describe the solution you'd like

  • Overall, the UI needs to be judicial about real estate. We don't need all those fancy margins/paddings and oversized fonts.
  • Using different color backgrounds to demarcate request/response will help improve readability and reduce cognitive strain
  • I see mentions about UI revamp - if there's a beta version out, I'd love to give it a spin.

Describe alternatives you've considered

  • keep using postman :)
  • or use insomnia? But I don't really want to!
@liyasthomas
Copy link
Member

fyi, PW passes accessibility test by Lighthouse. Hope this settles the readability of the color contrast. However, you can switch themes from settings > themes to choose one that looks good in your monitor.

image

Will work on tweaking the response area to optimise long scrolling issues 👍

@mrchief
Copy link
Author

mrchief commented Apr 30, 2020

Thanks.

fyi, PW passes accessibility test by Lighthouse.

LOL, wish Lighthouse was a real person.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants