You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since https://github.com/loadsmart/rfcs/pull/197 got approved, I think we should evaluate the impact of requiring kroki as the only allowed tool for diagrams in RFCs. Kroki already supports multiple diagrams.
The motivation behind this is mostly based on the source code for diagrams living together with the rest of the documentation. That would leverage the maintainability and would avoid missing permissions with different services out there.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
https://github.com/barbosa/culture/blame/main/architecture/README.md#L7
Since https://github.com/loadsmart/rfcs/pull/197 got approved, I think we should evaluate the impact of requiring kroki as the only allowed tool for diagrams in RFCs. Kroki already supports multiple diagrams.
The motivation behind this is mostly based on the source code for diagrams living together with the rest of the documentation. That would leverage the maintainability and would avoid missing permissions with different services out there.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: